• Ruthalas@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    The labeling on those axes is horrific. A human is apparently about 7 units of “Large” on the “Size” axis, and can piss around 110 units of “Jet” on the “Shape” axis.

    What is 7 units of Large Size you wonder? Fuck you. What is 110 units of Jet Shape you ask? Hell if we know. You sure aren’t going to.

    What are all the unlabeled dots? Who cares. Sample size? “I saw one do it.”

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 minutes ago

      I feel like the three humans and dozens of cicadas are probably skewing the results as well.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And a bit smaller than a dog, slightly larger than a cat.

        Did these scientist observe and document a pissing toddler?

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        40 minutes ago

        With one data point as sample size, it could have been a baby, a huge bodybuilder or anything. Same goes for the human cow. None of this is reliable data and we shouldn’t even discuss it here.

      • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I mean, humans are about 150 or 200 freedom units, and various breeds of cow weigh 10x that or more