Godric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 天前Happy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldimagemessage-square165linkfedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down145
arrow-up1906arrow-down1imageHappy anniversary of the day absolutely nothing happened at nowhere square!lemmy.worldGodric@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 13 天前message-square165linkfedilink
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·11 天前Why do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·11 天前Why do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-211 天前Because you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·11 天前And you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·11 天前Ho I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down6·11 天前If that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前Lol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前Did that even make sense in your head?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·11 天前No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·11 天前https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down6·11 天前So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source. What do you want more? Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-211 天前You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
minus-squareDiurnambule@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-211 天前Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down5·11 天前So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
minus-squareFireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
minus-squareBrainInABox@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·11 天前Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool
Vibes based statistics
Why do you avoid answering to the comment with fact in it ? https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421
Why do you keep resorting to lazy personal attacks?
Because you keep choosing to answer weak arguments. Just to precise, in what was it a perosnnal attack ?
And you keep choosing to resort to lazy personal attacks. And you know which ones are personal attacks, don’t play dumb
Ho I am 100% convinced your a paid troll, sorry if it hurt you. But you still avoid answering.
If that was true you wouldn’t keep replying. You know I’m not, you’re just using it as a personal attack
Lol no because I love to play with troll. I you were not I would have let it go since long before. Since your paid you should work
Did that even make sense in your head?
No. I looked at different testimonials and believe this estimation is safer and closer to a potential reality.
And those would be?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre - Death toll section
I believe I checked the numbers at the French page some time ago, and based on the diversity of reports and their background, I personally believed that it was around 500. I do get that people can estimate a bit more or a bit less though.
So Wikipedia is what convinced you?
Wikipedia is a community-driven encyclopedia based on sources. All claims include a source.
What do you want more?
Those articles being on a controversial topic, have been moderated and are pretty well done in my opinion.
You should ask him about this : https://lemmy.nz/comment/15846421 Seem to be too much for him.
We got it. They’re avoiding to answer or acknowledge your comment.
Not my comment though. And he answer and acknowledged my comment fine. But not this one I wonder why. Edit : typo
So it was Wikipedia that convinced you?
I was convinced something happened way before this, but for the number of deaths, yes, that was my source.
Ok. They’d fail you for that in highschool