abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agoEight US states seek to outlaw chemtrails – even though they aren’t realwww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square103linkfedilinkarrow-up1579arrow-down110cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up1569arrow-down1external-linkEight US states seek to outlaw chemtrails – even though they aren’t realwww.theguardian.comabacabadabacaba@infosec.pub to Not The Onion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 18 hours agomessage-square103linkfedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-squaresurph_ninja@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·9 hours ago The point was not about if it was happening or not. The title of the article literally claims it’s not happening, which is false.
minus-squareremotelove@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·8 hours agoThe title of the article is referring to “chemtrails” as false. (You are blocked now too. So no point in responding.)
minus-squaresurph_ninja@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·8 hours agoThe invocation of chemtrails was specifically on the part of the author of the article. If you actually read the details, the laws are restricting geoengineering. And it’s worth commenting so your ignorance doesn’t stand for anyone else reading.
The title of the article literally claims it’s not happening, which is false.
The title of the article is referring to “chemtrails” as false. (You are blocked now too. So no point in responding.)
The invocation of chemtrails was specifically on the part of the author of the article. If you actually read the details, the laws are restricting geoengineering.
And it’s worth commenting so your ignorance doesn’t stand for anyone else reading.