You don’t agree to pay it. You can’t opt out and if you don’t pay you get put in jail. How is this not theft?

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    10 days ago

    Thousands of years of civilization have taught us that it’s more efficient for everyone to pitch in to help each other than it is for everyone to live like a hermit and hoard their wealth.

        • Justathroughdaway@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          10 days ago

          But it’s something you didn’t ask for nor have the option to decline. The whole point of payment is that you choose to pay it.

          • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            10 days ago

            Do you choose to use roads? Do you choose to shower? Do you choose to use power? Do you choose to use sewer? Do you choose to use public parks? Do you choose to use libraries? Do you choose to use anything subsidized by the government?

            Then you’re choosing to pay for it. Million dollar infrastructure projects cannot be funded without taxes. It’s better if the load is balanced. This is why billionaires should be footing the majority of the bill, so you don’t have to cover their share. You should reframe your question to: why do billionaires steal money from us by not paying their fair share?

          • sandflavoured@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            You certainly do have the option to decline!

            Serious answer, living in a society is not the default way to live in the world.

            The option to say no is to decline to use the territory or services offered by a state.

            In other words, one would need to renounce citizenship of any countries one is a part of. Any commercial interactions they still have with a society will incur tax, if they prefer to not pay tax at all (for whatever reason), they would have to choose not to interact commercially with any person or organisation that is part of a state.

      • AE5NE@lemmy.radio
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Because the consensus definition of “theft” doesn’t include it.