• Mousy [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can’t imagine sweden will have the spine to do anything even though the crewmates were taken hostage on what i imagine is a vessal attributed to them in international waters. The fact that israel takes these actions is because they know western countries will give them impunity.

    • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      Looks like it’s UK flagged. Still, one of its citizens was kidnapped in an international act of piracy.

      France had one of its politicians kidnapped, I doubt it’s going to to do anything either.

      • Mousy [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 day ago

        Still, one of its citizens was kidnapped in an international act of piracy.

        If it’s an act of piracy then does that change possible jurisdiction? I skimmed through some articles and it seems like law around international waters is rather messy and ill-defined.

        • edge [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          From a quick search, it seems like international piracy has universal jurisdiction. So any country could prosecute I guess. I imagine countries have laws regarding piracy committed against vessels under their flag or committed against their citizens, but that’s per country so it depends on UK and/or Swedish law.

          But it also seems like the legal definition of piracy includes “private”, so maybe state actions don’t technically fall under piracy law (despite clearly being piracy)?