• brisk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Peertube has already delivered the sustainable model: creators host their own videos and viewers assist distribution.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      All they need that I see is missing, is a way to discover / search everyone from any instance. Like, a consolidated / federated search.

    • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Who pays for the servers? Because if even big platforms like Signal sometimes struggle to pay the bills, in part because they spend a lot on their servers, then it’ll be dozens of times worse with video hosting

      • brisk@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Content creators. It’s hard to host everyone’s videos, and it benefits monopolists to imply that doing so is necessary, as it prevents new entrants. It’s not nearly as hard to host your own server (or pay for it to be hosted). It becomes harder when you suddenly become popular, a situation which Peertube explicitly compensates for by sharing the distribution effort between viewers, which scales with popularity.

        Signal makes it’s own bed like YouTube by being a single centralised server for everyone. Nobody ever asks “who pays for the servers” when it comes to Matrix or XMPP