• Zeusz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If your character has no reason to stay either the plothook was insufficient or you made a bad character. Both should be adressed ooc.

    • positiveWHAT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      Create a new character that does have a reason to stick around. *Session 0 should be the creation of the story of how the group met, they should not meet in session 1.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        they should not meet in session 1.

        Strongly disagree. Nothing wrong with doing that, but nothing wrong with having them meet in session 1 too, as long as you have built characters who will be willing to go along with the GM’s hooks.

        And even that part is flexible, depending on the nature of the hook. If the hook is “you see an ad look for rat exterminators”, then you better have a character who wants to be an adventurer and will cooperate with other would-be adventurers. If the hook is “you’re prisoners being ordered to go explore this dungeon by order of the vizier”, there’s room for slightly less cooperative PCs, as long as you PC is cooperative enough to go along with that order, even if (at first) reluctantly.

        • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Meeting people with the inclination and schedule that I enjoy the company of to make a party with is the worst part of d&d. Please don’t make me role play it, too.

          • XM34@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            12 hours ago

            It might be your least favorite part of DnD, but there are plenty of people (myself included) who enjoy meeting a new group of characters and finding out about their particular ticks and specialties.

            • zero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I learn about the characters, myself included, throughout the campaign through their actions. Otherwise session one is like that time I asked a coworker about one of his tattoos and had to hear about his sister’s murder. That’s more of a session two+ thing to me.

              • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 hours ago

                For me, the tired trope of “strangers meet in a tavern” approach is the inevitable round of introductions that feels like that time at the start of school when everyone had to stand up to say their name and one interesting fact about them. It’s just awkward and everyone wants it to be over quickly.

                Much better to just create characters together in session 0. Everyone already knows each other, their motivations, prior relationships established, etc… and just begin the campaign as if everyone is already on mission.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The DM came up with the plot hook and the players agreed to play, so the players need to put some effort into finding a reason to go along with the plot hook.

        Suggestions on making the hook more engaging is an option too!

    • LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Or third option: the person is operating independent of Table expectations or their character. Some folks just don’t get it and frankly I wonder why they want to play the game. It’s incredibly rare, but I have seen it.

      You don’t have to put on a voice in a costume and write 20 pages of lore, but if you’re going to play at my table, I expect you to remain in character unless you have a question for me more or less. I expect you to take it seriously and use basic social etiquette. I’ve never played with somebody who was incapable of realizing that they are not being fun/funny, or considerate. They just get main character syndrome and stop listening to people for some reason.

      It’s all about listening. If you’re capable of being at a table with a few people in life, then you’re capable of playing D&D!