dead [he/him]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 14 days agoTrump says US bombed 3 Iran nuclear siteshexbear.netimagemessage-square130linkfedilinkarrow-up1154arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up1154arrow-down1imageTrump says US bombed 3 Iran nuclear siteshexbear.netdead [he/him]@hexbear.net to news@hexbear.netEnglish · 14 days agomessage-square130linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·14 days agoYes, it’s good to be precise with statements. It’s also good to deliver precise information in a way that does not imply further misinformation. Take this statement: “X has happened” If you reply with “It’s not X”, you inadvertently imply that nothing has happened. “It’s Y, not X” does not have the same implication.
minus-squarememoryfoam44@lemm.eeBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-211 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareWheaties [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down2·14 days ago inadvertently
Yes, it’s good to be precise with statements.
It’s also good to deliver precise information in a way that does not imply further misinformation. Take this statement:
If you reply with “It’s not X”, you inadvertently imply that nothing has happened. “It’s Y, not X” does not have the same implication.
deleted by creator