• bremen15@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      18 天前

      Its slop if its useless or wrong. If it is i will come back and edit it. I need to test it first.

      • sfjvvssss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 天前

        I guess if people want to read answers generated by an LLM, they would just ask one.

      • Madrigal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        17 天前

        The anti-AI morons on Lemmy can’t or won’t tell the difference. They think “slop” is just a term for any LLM-generated (or refined) content. There’s no nuance to their thinking at all. They don’t assess the quality of the information provided or how the tool is actually being used.

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 天前

          Given the sources don’t really back up the content, I think it’s safe to say this is slop. You should probably proof AI slop before you white knight it next time.

          • Madrigal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            17 天前

            The question was about document management systems that can be run in docker. The LLM response listed four document management systems that can be run in docker.

            Was it a perfect response? No.

            Was it a useful response? Yes.

            Was it a better contribution to the discussion than yours? Lol.

            • thesmokingman@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              17 天前

              The current thread is about AI slop, not DMS. You helped create the branch we’re on. You said “people on Lemmy can’t tell slop from useful info.” I said “this is AI slop because the sources don’t match,” assuming that I wouldn’t have to explain the hallucinations (fabrications is a bit better here) because that usually comes with slop. Since the current thread is about whether or not slop is meaningful, I have no idea what you added by saying “hey I attacked someone for not liking AI then attacked someone else for a refutation of the AI that I was white knighting.”