compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前Meta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comexternal-linkmessage-square151linkfedilinkarrow-up1787arrow-down118cross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmit.onlinenews@hexbear.net
arrow-up1769arrow-down1external-linkMeta appoints anti-LGBTQ+ conspiracy theorist Robby Starbuck as AI bias advisorwww.thepinknews.comcompostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 个月前message-square151linkfedilinkcross-posted to: nottheonion@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmit.onlinenews@hexbear.net
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down2·2 个月前That doesn’t disprove my statement.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down6·2 个月前No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
minus-squareripcord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 个月前OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 个月前Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
minus-squareOrteilGenou@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-22 个月前We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
minus-squareFloodedwomb@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·2 个月前If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
minus-squarecabillaud@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·2 个月前That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo
That doesn’t disprove my statement.
No, but it knocks a little wind out of the sail.
Not even a little.
OK, but it’s a really weird - and I think unhelpful - way for people to keep framing reality. Like we’re trying to pretend it’s just some story.
Yes, it doesn’t help that it’s an incredibly cliche piece of terminology.
That too.
We’re in the dumbest possible Lemmy chat string
If there’s only one time line, and you assert that it is the dumbest time line, it follows that it is also the smartest time line. Thereby rendering the statement null. Its not unproven, but neither does it matter.
That is a good example of talking to say nothing imo