• itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not nearly as much as it should be. In many places certain ISPs have near monopolies over internet access, and domains and dns used on the web are managed by ICANN. Sure, there’s alternatives to that, but barely anyone knows or uses them

        • PHLAK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          I understand what you’re saying but it feels wrong to lump Cloudflare in with Google and Amazon. Clouflare, thus far anyway, has been mostly a force of good for the internet.

          • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            So was Google in its first decade or so. Hell, I’ll even grant that AWS, GCP and k8s have been mostly benevolent. But these parties becoming near monopolies for hosting or routing is costing a price of centralization.

      • PHLAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Companies having a geographic monopoly over access to the internet doesn’t change the fact that the Internet as a whole is decentralized.

        That being said, yes, something should be done about ISPs.

    • rusticus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      lol. Net neutrality and FCCs Ajit Pai. Educate yourself bra.