This is something I’ve been thinking about for a while, and it’s a huge problem, but I don’t really see a lot of discussion about it. We have the technological means now for every single person on the planet to communicate directly with every single other person, in near-real time. The only real barrier to it is logistical (and is mostly impeded by resource hoarding). That’s amazing. And the recent election in Nepal via Discord has me thinking again about how the internet could form the basis for a real, democratic, world government. There are a ton of problems that would need to be addressed, off the top of my head:

  • not everyone has internet access
  • not everyone that has access has unfettered access
  • It’s hard to preserve anonymity and have fair elections
  • it’s hard to verify elections haven’t been tampered with
  • what happens when violent crimes are committed?
  • how do taxes work in this system?
  • how do armed forces work in this system?

I don’t think any of these problems are necessarily unsolvable, but I don’t know how. So, how would we get from where we are to where we want to be? How do we even define what the end state should look like?

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Democracy doesn’t require every person vote on every issue.

    Also there has never been a direct democracy in human history because it has never been technologically possible, no Greece was not a direct democracy.

    You’re kind of just grasping at straws here.

    If it feels like a bad system to you then that’s a you problem.

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This is the dumbest thing I’ve read all day lmao.

      Idk how historically illiterate you are, but direct democracy HAS been used plenty of times throughout history. Native American tribes like Muscogee, Swiss Cantons, and even early colonial New England towns all used direct democracy. There are plenty of examples of it being used, however, it’s only ever been implemented successfully on small scales. Technology isn’t a limiting factor and never was, it’s only a limiting factor when it’s implemented on really large scales due to the logistics, however, the issues of logistics go BEYOND just technological limitations. You would think that this is just common knowledge, but apparently not.

      But if you’re genuinely incapable of comprehending any of the points that I made then you’re not qualified for this conversation.