• RidderSport@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I am not too familiar with NA law, however there’s a thing called ommission as in the opposite of action. Now you can obviously commit a crime by performing an action, but the same is true by not doing anything when you’re supposed to act. Those that are by law expected to act ar guarantors, for example emergency service people, doctors and parents. This would fall under such a category

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t really see that. People are generally paid to take on that responsibility or have otherwise agreed to it. They can generally end that responsibility when they want to. If anything what you said is a pro abortion argument. I don’t think there is any framework where sex is an agreement to raise a baby, nor do I think anyone is committing any crime taking any action to terminate a pregnancy. Forced birth is the crime.

      • RidderSport@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh please don’t misunderstand me, I am very much pro-abortion and the so-called “pro-life-people” sicken me. I was just talking about the fact that legally speaking parents are obliged to care for their child. By which I don’t mean that they can not give up that responsibility nor that anyone should be forced to carry out a child.