RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agoIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?message-squaremessage-square65linkfedilinkarrow-up1457arrow-down114
arrow-up1443arrow-down1message-squareIf A.I. is so fast and efficient, and CEOs are paid so much, why not replace CEOs with A.I.?RegularJoe@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · 2 days agomessage-square65linkfedilink
minus-squarezxqwas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down1·2 days agoYou would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·2 days agoWe’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
minus-squareCompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·2 days agoIt doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!
You would not want to use AI anywhere it matters. Only in places where it does not matter if you get it right the first, second or even the third time, like customer support.
We’re going inception style now, but then ceo would be even more fitting, don’t you think?
It doesn’t matter, so … the CEO is perfect application!