commander@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.world · 7 天前Google confirms Android dev verification will have free and paid tiers, no public list of devsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square72linkfedilinkarrow-up1238arrow-down11cross-posted to: android@lemdro.id
arrow-up1237arrow-down1external-linkGoogle confirms Android dev verification will have free and paid tiers, no public list of devsarstechnica.comcommander@lemmy.world to Android@lemmy.world · 7 天前message-square72linkfedilinkcross-posted to: android@lemdro.id
minus-squareHexesofVexes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up103·7 天前"Google, however, has decided anonymity is too risky. " The rest of the sane universe appear to be deciding Google is too risky.
minus-squareCapricorn_Geriatric@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·7 天前Sorry for knitpicking, but saying “the rest of the sane world” implies Google is also sane.
minus-squareHexesofVexes@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·7 天前Sane => Worry Google is a threat Worry Google is a threat =/> Sane
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up48arrow-down1·7 天前The cognitive dissonance with saying that the current state of Android is “too risky” without giving a single example of why it supposedly is.
"Google, however, has decided anonymity is too risky. "
The rest of the sane universe appear to be deciding Google is too risky.
Sorry for knitpicking, but saying “the rest of the sane world” implies Google is also sane.
Sane => Worry Google is a threat
Worry Google is a threat =/> Sane
The cognitive dissonance with saying that the current state of Android is “too risky” without giving a single example of why it supposedly is.