• ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I don’t know why people keep saying this. You either pay for a service, or you get a company extracting as much data as they can from you for advertiser or VC money. Servers and bandwidth cost money

    • arsCynic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I don’t know why people keep saying this. You either pay for a service, or you get a company extracting as much data as they can from you for advertiser or VC money. Servers and bandwidth cost money

      1. Some people pay for Discord and they still exploit their data.
      2. Some people pay for Lichess and their whole website is free of charge without tracking/advertising.

      Yes, things cost money. Yes, ideally those who can pay for it should. No, something being free doesn’t legitimize unethical means to make a profit.


      ⚜︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

      • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You know those are the exceptions, not the rules. Capitalism means that you play the dirty tricks everyone else does or get left behind. Legislation is the way out of this, not the delusion that we can convince people to just “choose better”. I tried to convince people for the better half of a decade. People simply do not have the knowledge to understand why they should care.

    • Kissaki@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Telegram is profitable through semi-pushing some cryptocurrency and selling premium. Various free-to-play games are profitable through the sale of optional content.

      There are alternatives in offering delayed or optional monetary costs.