• non_burglar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    At the very least I have an adopted brother over there that depends on tourists

    That’s the point, and that’s why the guy is not “chill” about it.

    Tourism is very much a colonial economy when there is income inequity. I am sorry that your adopted brother depends on tourists for income, but that does not justify the inequity.

    If you were to hire a Sherpa in the Alps or Canada, you’d be paying a hell of a lot more for the privilege of the climb. So tell us again why these rich folks get away with paying so little…

    When you make the argument that the locals depend on the income, you are also implying that it’s OK the locals earn so little without these rich folks.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nope, I’m not saying any of that. I’m just happy that he -specifically he who I very much know- can eat because some tourists pay him for his art. So in that frame it is not all negative. Whatever the price is really, he comes from living in a monastery in India to going back to his home country and being able to sustain himself with that money. System is not perfect but at least he eats.

      If you worry about that you’ll have to consider all other inequalities in manufacturing as well… or in IT…. So why just that one example ?