God is love just don’t ask for the receipts

He’s all powerful except for whenever

How many Jesus, the Living Embodiment of YHWH, does it take to change a lightbulb

  • CXORA@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    That doesn’t make sense.

    If i choose to murder someone i am impeding their free will.

    If god chooses to save someone from murder, then it impedes the free will of the murderer.

    Why is only one of those a problem?

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s like the difference between the government punishing you for free speech and a Lemmy mod banning you.

      • CXORA@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        In your example the outcomes are different. What if the only difference was the actor who stopped the murder, would that still make a difference?

        Eg: if i trip a murderer so they can’t kill the victim, vs if god causes a murderer to trip. Ia one of those violating free will and a other one not?

        • village604@adultswim.fan
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Maybe it’ll help to think about it in terms of an experiment. God is the scientist and humans are the test subjects. If the scientist interferes with the test subjects, the data loses meaning, but if the test subjects interfere with each other it’s just part of the experiment.

          Basically: supreme authority interfering = bad.