You are very clearly arguing in bad faith, as evidenced by your bending over backwards to be contrarian and scarecrowing the argument you’re fighting against. I’m not wasting any more time with you, which is sad, because this conversation started off well.
And that regulation covers meat production and transport, I couldn’t find anything in there relating to how meat products must be shelved in shops. Which is what we were talking about. My issue isn’t that you didn’t quote a specific part of the regulation, it’s that the regulation you quoted doesn’t seem to cover what you’re arguing it does. And the fact that you’re arguing this way pretty much confirms that you didn’t even read the source you’re quoting.
You are very clearly arguing in bad faith, as evidenced by your bending over backwards to be contrarian and scarecrowing the argument you’re fighting against. I’m not wasting any more time with you, which is sad, because this conversation started off well.
And that regulation covers meat production and transport, I couldn’t find anything in there relating to how meat products must be shelved in shops. Which is what we were talking about. My issue isn’t that you didn’t quote a specific part of the regulation, it’s that the regulation you quoted doesn’t seem to cover what you’re arguing it does. And the fact that you’re arguing this way pretty much confirms that you didn’t even read the source you’re quoting.
…
You know what? You’re right. This conversation makes no sense anymore. EOT on my part.