☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 15 天前Ring’s CEO says his cameras can almost ‘zero out crime’ within the next 12 monthswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1120arrow-down13
arrow-up1117arrow-down1external-linkRing’s CEO says his cameras can almost ‘zero out crime’ within the next 12 monthswww.theverge.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 15 天前message-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareFoxyFerengi@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up58·15 天前Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
minus-squarecrunchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·15 天前It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
minus-squarebirdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·14 天前Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
minus-squareshiftymccool@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·14 天前It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
minus-squarephilophilsaurus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·15 天前Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·14 天前How much good did it make in all these years before tv?
Countries with extensive cctv networks still have lots of crime, almost like surveillance is the wrong answer to lowering crime or something
It’s a good answer if you want to watch all the crime that’s still happening
Until police selectively disables some cameras whenever it goes outside.
It’s a good answer if your goal isn’t actually to lower crime but you say it is so you can add buttloads of surveillance for data gathering
Honestly if we want crime to go down we should just stop reporting it.
How much good did it make in all these years before tv?