• GreyShuck@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good to see that NE actually has the resources to take action in cases like this - they are massively under-resourced.

    However, I wonder how much the cost of this to the developer - £14500 - most of which are court costs - is actually a deterrent. That is not a lot for many developments, and I can see that it would be tempting to simply write it off as an acceptable cost.

    There was no mention of whether they developer was required, as a result of this judgement, to add the access tiles and replace the felt as the original licence required either.

    • Big_Twerp@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It looks like they might be made to replace the roof lining (otherwise they would be contravening their planning commitments) so that will cost them.