bogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandexternal-linkmessage-square4linkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandbogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square4linkfedilink
minus-squareLordbaum@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoIsn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoDepends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·2 years agoWeston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-22 years agoBut it’s one monolith, same as X.
Isn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
Depends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
Weston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
But it’s one monolith, same as X.