bogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1external-linkAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandbogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareLordbaum@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoIsn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoDepends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 year agoWeston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 year agoBut it’s one monolith, same as X.
Isn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
Depends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
Weston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
But it’s one monolith, same as X.