bogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandimagemessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down10
arrow-up12arrow-down1imageAre these the supposed "benefits" of waylandbogokeb to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square4fedilink
minus-squareLordbaum@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoIsn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoDepends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·9 months agoWeston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-29 months agoBut it’s one monolith, same as X.
Isn’t the main Argument that it has a smaller, cleaner and more modern codebase, which is easier to maintain. And has a smaller attack surface?
Depends on the implementation. The reference, Weston, is not.
Weston is by file size, about equal to xserver. But really there is more utility in Weston than xserver.
But it’s one monolith, same as X.