Individually doing atmospheric analysis for every planet in the galaxy is probably an impossible task for a civilisation confined to a single solar system. Listening for signals is something our civilisation already does. If we discover radio signals from a primitive civilisation in the next star system over there’s a non-zero chance we’d panic and try to wipe them out.

That’s the risk that dark forest theory is talking about. Maybe the threat comes from a civilisation dedicated to wiping out intelligent life that just hasn’t found you yet, maybe it just comes from your nearest neighbor. Maybe there’s no threat at all. The risk of interplanetary war is still too great to turn on a light in the forest and risk a bullet from the dark.

And while knowing this, why do we still not choose to just observe and be as quiet/ non existant as possible?

  • INeedMana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Everything that travels via a wave (wifi, gsm, radio, tv, etc) travels in more or less planar dimension. in order to stop it, you’d have to have some kind of wave blocking shutter (physical requirements for such a block would depend on the length of the waves you want to block) around the whole planet. Blocking waves is not feasible as long as we want to have sun

    https://xkcd.com/273/

  • FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    The Dark Forest theory is something that makes for a scary sci-fi novel, but it isn’t really plausible in the real world. One of the major reasons is that individually doing atmospheric analysis for every planet in the galaxy actually is an entirely possible task, especially for a civilization that’s supposedly advanced enough and close-by enough to be able to destroy our civilization somehow. If advanced alien civilizations were present in our galaxy and had the philosophy of destroying potential competitors before they also become advanced then we should have been wiped out hundreds of millions of years ago already. We shouldn’t exist under a Dark Forest scenario.

    • roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      In Alastair Reynolds’ Revelation Space series, the victors of a “dawn war” far in the galaxy’s past were machines and they decided to wipe out any sentient life in the galaxy for reasons that aren’t important here, but not life in general. But by the time we came around they had degraded to the point that they weren’t doing a good job anymore and a few civilizations were just starting to slip out into space. Then they get detected and destroyed.

      So the combination of wanting to destroy civilizations, but not all life and breaking down over time would allow it.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is another example of a scary sci-fi novel needing a very specific set of circumstances to arise in order for the scary sci-fi novel’s story to work. It isn’t a plausible case to be basing any real-world decisions or science on.

        It’s like trying to have a serious discussion of vigilantism and the death penalty and someone brings up Freddy Krueger as the basis for their argument.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I know this is all hypothetical, but remember they may have the ability, but haven’t reached the cultural moment, where they have the interest. That could be any random moment now or in the future too

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        If this is to be a Fermi paradox solution (which the Dark Forest is usually presented as) then it has to be universal. “Sometimes a civilization somewhere decides to kill a few potential rivals” isn’t enough to explain why the universe appears to be silent.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A fair point, but even though we assume time and space are massive, there is an ordering to things.

          There is a day before a civilization decides to kill it’s neighbors, and a day after.

          We can assume the state of things (big old space should have had that plot arc already) but we can’t know if we are still in the opening episode, or before it.

          Regarding general silence, agree that is not answered by my discussion. I personally lean more towards x factors disturbing our assumptions. (I.e. long running biospheres with zero advancement to radio age) but I increasingly wonder if we are just early to the party, as egotistical as that sounds. Imagine that the civilization that will one day rule the galaxy / universe is just now figuring out how to make a basic tool?

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 months ago

    The dangers of Active SETI are based on a lot of human-centric assumptions.

    Any hypothetical alien civilisation advanced enough to pose a threat may see our radio broadcasts and space probes as being so crude that they consider us too harmless to bother with.

    If there are actively “xenocidal” aliens out there they may also have far more effective ways of detecting their targets.

    • htrayl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Disagree. The counterargument is simple - space is large and time is long. We aren’t a threat now but we could easily become a threat in, say, 1000 years. Which, is basically no time at all in interstellar politics. Any species who could potentially become a technical capable threat should be assumed as a technically capable threat.

  • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 months ago

    Here is my take on it. It all depends on if there is some sort of hard limit on how much we can accelerate an object with mass in space.

    If we are capped at say, 25% of the speed of light we will most likely never meet our intragalactic neighbours. The times scales and distances involved are insurmountable and economically they would have no reason to attempt travel to another inhabited planet. The journey is too dangerous on many levels to be worth attempting. No reason to contact, no reason to fight, many closer resouces in our respective solar neighbourhoods that wont shoot missiles at us.

    If we live in a universe that allows for FLT or even just 99.9999 percent of c then the alien overlords are already aware of us and are chill enough to leaves us be for the most part. So it really almost doesnt matter in my opinion.

    I did love the 3 body problem trilogy, Liu Cixin is a master story teller.

    • Fondots@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      then the alien overlords are already aware of us

      Unless they have been actively and vigorously scouting for us with FTL travel, our earliest radio transmissions, even if we assume they’re somehow still recognizable and not totally lost in the background noise of space, have only made it about 126 light years or so from earth (and honestly our very earliest ones probably wouldn’t be recognizable from very far at all, Marconi’s radio was of course pretty crude, it was our first time playing with radios, so we can probably chop a good 20+ light-years off of that easily if we’re being realistic)

      Now that encompasses some 60,000 or so stars, which is a tiny speck of the observable universe, and depending on how you fill out the Drake equation that could be a whole lot of aliens out there listening, or literally no one. And only about half of them, assuming no FTL travel or communication, would have had a chance to get a response to us by now (if they even wanted to) since their response would have to travel at or below C.

      If they’re in the Milky Way or nearby intergalactic space and have bothered to point instruments at us that are far beyond the capabilities we have on earth now today within the last 300,000 years, they may know that homo sapiens exist, but they’d need to be within 3000 light years to know that we entered the bronze age, and within about 200 to know that we’ve even started playing with electricity (and counting on them looking specifically at us is a real long-shot)

      Parts of the Andromeda galaxy, at best, is maybe aware that Australopithecus evolved. Any further out and no one has any clue that anything really resembling humans at all is here.

      Now that sort of isolation does give us a bit of security in case there is a xenocidal race that would like to wipe us out somewhere in the universe, unless we’re very unlucky we probably have a long time before we have to worry about them even knowing we’re here, and at least that long again until they can do anything about it (unless they do have FTL travel) so probably not something we actually need to be concerned about, again unless we get really unlucky the sun dying in a couple billion years is probably a more pressing concern.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I think it’s likely we’re the first and oldest advanced civilization in the universe, which means we’ll likely always have a technological advantage to the tune of 100+ thousand years head start. It’s entirely plausible that we are the future’s xenocidal species.

    • eran_morad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Our nearest intragalactic neighbors are no closer than 4.25 ly. We’re not going to get out of our solar system with a manned mission. You can forget about intergalactic.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I also loved The 3 Body Problem. I got chills during the first book when >!the first message said DO NOT ANSWER! !<

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Haha absolutely not! When she replied, I think I might have said out loud “oh you bitch!”

          It was super reckless of her to be like, “well my life has sucked so far so I’m going to make this huge monumental decision unilaterally on behalf of all humanity.”

          With that being said, had she not done what she did, I’m sure it would have happened otherwise. Still was reckless as hell!

          • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            You see, I myself was conflicted.

            On one hand, I can see how repeated frequent personal tragedies of violence can break a person to the point that they hate everyone they see. I can sympathise with that, growing up I was the arbitrary target at school and at home most of the time. It brought me to some really dark places in the past. Things are much better now but it leaves a stain, it lurks.

            On the other hand, she was explicitly warned that Trisolarans were looking to conquer a new planet and just flat out ignored it. I get being angry and depressed but willfully stupid in an otherwise smart person is much harder to forgive. I mean, she discovered ETI… become famous? Naaahhhh lets doom everyone because I’m mad at the government.

            That scene really stuck with me

            Have you read The Locked Tomb series?

            • jballs@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              No I haven’t read that one. Oddly enough, I’m reading another series - the Silo series by High Howey - that could almost be called that same name! What’s it about? I might have to check it out next.

              • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Space necromancers, memes, lesbians, swords, skulls, gore, ‘one flesh one end’

                I’ve been looking for a new series, Ill check out Silo

                • jballs@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Haha nice. I can’t say that Silo has anything that crazy, but it’s still with checking out

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Because it’s sci-fi nonsense essentially.

    Just because someone has a theory doesn’t automatically mean we should live by it.

    I mean this could all be a simulation so why bother living right?

  • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    The big thing people over look when considering the we are broadcasting thousands od watts into space, they might hear use is SNR

    Signal to noise ratio. (the more random stuff on a frequency the harder it is to read the signal)

    Yes, humans are pumping out a huge amount of radio (etc) signals into space. it is not coherent or directed.

    Thousands of antennae all over the world pumping different signals but from far away, they are all noise interfering with each other.

    IIRC: Even if there was a radio telescope only a few light years away, all they would see pointing directly at earth would be static.

    • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not to mention the signal degrades, and the signals from the ww2 era have only reached 80 light years away. Any farther away and the signal has not reached them yet

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Even then, the signal strength is not high enough. It gets overshadowed by the CMBR before it gets anywhere significant.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Had to come to the bottom of the thread to find the only take that matters. Talk of our signals being noticed is about unthinkable given the inverse square law.

  • angrystego@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Because our civilization is not united. We’re unable to coordinate and act as one being.

  • spittingimage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    In the hope of proving intelligent life exists somewhere in the universe.

    (Sorry. Feeling a bit cynical this morning.)

  • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The real question here will be if a more advanced civilization would want to make contact with humankind, or if that advanced civilization would prefer to do abductions and experiments over humans to find a way to have humankind under control.

    Why would they want to make contact instead of an undercover take over the planet?

    Edit: TBH I have never understood the weird concept some people have about Aliens and UFOs, I mean about thinking they are chill dudes who will come here to exchange knowledge, pay some hookers and snort cocaine with us everything shine and good, but tbh I believe they are more the kind to make experiments with us and get humankind existence gone. Supposing they have the knowledge to get here I don’t believe they would like to chill with the monkeys.

  • GregorTacTac@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I agree with you here. If we just listen we can know that they are the ones who want to make contact, not us. The we can make the decision whether to send a message back or not.