NY bill would require a criminal history background check for the purchase of a 3D printer::Requires a criminal history background check for the purchase of a three-dimensional printer capable of creating firearms; prohibits sale to a person who would be disqualified on the basis of criminal history from being granted a license to possess a firearm.

  • db2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    A tube capable of firing a projectile isn’t hard to make though. Maybe they should require a criminal history background check to go to the hardware store too.

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Classic pro-gun community, rushing to brigade a gun-related post with pre-prepared talking points.

      “Why bother fixing gun laws that clearly fail to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people when you can just 3D print a gun?”

      *someone makes a move to stop dangerous people 3D printing guns*

      “Why bother preventing dangerous people 3D printing guns when you can just buy a bit of pipe at the hardware store?”

      Criminals and domestic terrorists overwhelmingly just go to a store and buy a gun. The pro-gun community is fine with this.

      For the minority that can’t, straw purchases, gun show loopholes and poorly secured firearms give them much better access to safer, more reliable guns than 3D printing does. The pro-gun community is fine with this too.

      A tiny fraction of crimes involve 3D printed gun parts and I’m not aware of any domestic terrorism to use any. Nevertheless, somebody could in theory print parts for a fully automatic weapon that would potentially be reliable enough for a mass shooting.

      So how many crimes are being comitted with a piece of old pipe?

      I know self-absorbed, gun-owning, 300lbs men pretending they’d be useful in a militia want to angrily hammer out a comment along the lines of “WHAT ABOUT THAT ASSASSINATION IN JAPAN YOU CUCK”.

      But the one example you can cite without googling, from every single country with gun control was clearly dogshit barely worked.

      It would be a massive improvement if American criminals were forced to use home made firearms that significantly increased the price, difficulty to obtain and the danger to themselves using it.

      But the pro-gun community objects by walking down a list of bullshit excuses because they can’t just say “I’d rather people were shot than I was inconvienced”.

      • db2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not pro-gun, stupid. I’m pro-thinking which you’re clearly not. Nice troll username btw.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          You rushed right in with their talking points, so I assumed your goal was to spread them. I don’t want to break your little heart but I respond to the things people say on social media without forming an intimate relationship with them first.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m against it because I know the pro-gun claim of “fixing deeply flawed gun laws is pointless because people will just 3D print guns” is a lie.

          Should it one day come true, I’d reconsider my position.

          But it hasn’t come true anywhere else in the world, nor have any other pro-gun promises come true in the last 20 years.

          • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The point of a fully printed gun would be a zip gun mostly. One shot up close to steal a real gun from a better equipped force. Same with a pipe gun. They’re for upgrading.

              • PsychedSy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Why would I? If you knew what a zip gun was for you’d realize how ignorant that question is.

                Regardless, here’s a historical zip.

                I think Japan had a recent situation with a hand made firearm as well.

                • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Okay, so not how criminals and terrorists get their guns, because they just walk into a shop and buy them.

              • oatscoop@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sure, especially considering they said fully printed – no pre-made firearm components.

                The FP-45 Liberator pistol and the CIA’s Deer Gun are “real” guns designed for that exact purpose: to kill someone at close range to steal their gun. The first “successful” 3d printed gun was the Defense Distributed Liberator, followed by a plethora of single shot “zip guns” of the same type.

                So … a bunch of 3d printed guns specifically copied from the concept of the FP-45 and Deer Gun.

                • PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I fixed your link. I wouldn’t want people missing out on that “Usage” section.

                  Thanks though, I’ve bookmarked it for when people claim that gun restrictions are pointless because of 3D printers.