• nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    the Suyu development team has decided to avoid “any monetization,”

    Should of always been like that

    • ezchili@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Either emulation is legal and you’re therefore okay with devs getting payment for tgeir labor or it’s illegal and they need to keep as low a profile as they can

      I hate people who try to be on both sides

      • 520@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The monetisation part wasn’t what fucked them over, it was merely what made their more illicit activities worse.

        The Yuzu team were using leaks to tweak their code, namely the ToTK leak.

        • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          IP law is at it’s core about monetization and developer compensation. The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

          • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

            You are absolutely mistaken. See Sony’s lawsuits against Connectix and Bleem!, which were both commercial products, and Sony lost every lawsuit they filed against them.

            I don’t know where you and the other thousands of people parroting this online are getting this from, but it is not true and never has been.

          • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            The legality of emulation absolutely hinges on whether or not the alleged infringement is monetized.

            Sony lost all of their suits against Bleem!, sorry but it’s not illegal to monetize an emulator. The rampant piracy they were engaging in and essentially promoting is what fucked them. Including using leaks to test their emulator against and patch issues with games that hadn’t been released yet. There’s been talk that they also had a ROM stash on their discord.

          • 520@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Nope. There have been monetised emulators before that have been deemed legal (see Bleem!)

            Also if you break copyright law, the rights holder can come after you regardless if you are making money or not.

      • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        I agree but pay walling features is just asking for trouble, I should of specified what I meant with pateron.

        • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The features weren’t exactly paywalled, as the source code was always available. They merely provided beta builds to patreons, that were also available free of charge by someone else [1].

          ~~[1] https://github.com/pineappleEA/pineapple-src/releases~~

          Selling emulators is legal, as far as we know (been a while since the last ruling). If it’s true what others have pointed out, that yuzu devs were distributing copyrighted material in their public discord and talking open about privacy, then Nintendo has support for their argument that yuzu was intentionally designed to circumvent copy protection and purposely facilitates piracy.

          • nanoUFO@sh.itjust.worksOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Isn’t pineapple just stealing the builds from pateron and did they release the current source code or did that get released after pateron build went public. I didn’t really keep track of it.

            • Chewy@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              You’re likely right, it seems like they made use of the code being open-source and distributed it freely after getting access through patreon. Each commit is quite big with all the source code changes of the specific early access build.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Disagree. People deserve compensation for labor, and the Yuzu devs did good work. It’s our laws that suck.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Anyone trying to make money on a licensed IP they don’t own is in hot water.

    • Kinglink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ehhh… it’s ok if there’s money involved but they definitely pushed it too far. However even if there was no money involved Yuzu made actions that shut them down.

      Smart if you can self fund, but at the end of the day there’s a lot of costs that people ignore when it comes to emulation or things in the space. Working with a group called Retroachievements.org (small plug) and they accept donations for server costs but that’s it. Signed up for 1 dollar on Patreon and wanted to give them 10. They refused, which is a good sign.