Anarchy is a political structure where there’s basically no one in charge, right? But wouldn’t that just create a power vacuum that would filled by organized crime, corporations, etc.? Then, after that power vacuum is filled, we’re right back at square one, and someone is in charge.

Are there any political theorists that have come up with a solution to this problem?

    • Klear@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      If your idea of not scaling up involves a super NATO of thousands of nation states, you should probably go back to the drawing board.

    • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      insert alt-right fantasy about how great ancient Europe was /s

      Jokes aside, the cities model worked because that was the scale a society was able to grow to. Transport was very difficult as was communication. And even in the ancient cities there was a power hierarchy with councils of elders and stuff.