I feel like you’re twisting my meaning to incite an argument I’m not trying to have or back.
Sometimes coups are good, sometimes bad. End of thought.
The end result of the coup in Haiti was “it was bad”. End of thought.
If you think the USA was behind the coup, the coup that turned out to be bad, then you probably think the Clintons returning him to power was also bad. End of thought.
If you think the USA was behind the coup, the coup that turned out to be bad, then you probably think the Clintons returning him to power was also bad. End of thought.
Okay, I might see where the disconnect is here.
The coup overthrew the democratically elected president, Aristide, during Bush Sr’s administration.
Bill Clinton, along with the international community, backed removing the coup leaders from power. and returning Aristide to office.
I feel like you’re twisting my meaning to incite an argument I’m not trying to have or back.
Sometimes coups are good, sometimes bad. End of thought.
The end result of the coup in Haiti was “it was bad”. End of thought.
If you think the USA was behind the coup, the coup that turned out to be bad, then you probably think the Clintons returning him to power was also bad. End of thought.
Okay, I might see where the disconnect is here.
The coup overthrew the democratically elected president, Aristide, during Bush Sr’s administration.
Bill Clinton, along with the international community, backed removing the coup leaders from power. and returning Aristide to office.
Yes. We’re both speaking about the factual events.
You asked a question that I mistook for you being unawares to why anyone could have the take of the OP.
I should have clocked you were trying to incite OP into an argument I wasn’t trying to have