They can try all they want. If it violates the Charter, it will never get past the debate stage before getting scrapped. There’s no point in passing legislation that will just get thrown out the first time it goes to court.

You don’t have to worry. There are already legal advocacy groups preparing to challenge it. It will never make it to a vote.

If it violates the Canadian Charter, then it won’t pass the debate stage, which means it won’t even make it to a vote.

This will never pass.

There’s also a certain element of “You can’t tell me what to do!”…followed by doing something incredibly stupid and self-destructive, just to “own the Libs”.

This is yet another astroturfed conservative movement. This whole topic is only supported by a very small number of people, yet it’s being amplified in the media in order to make it seem like a big deal. It isn’t.

Well that seems suspiciously convenient.

Definitely nothing corrupt about this. Aside from the quid pro quo, that is.

They already signed that contract. This is just Israel attacking them anyway.

You know they’re not going to stop there, though…right? Just look at what they’re doing in Gaza. They’re going to “liberate Iran”, alright. But, they don’t care if they end up bombing women and children in the process.

Next, they’ll start targeting schools, because that’s where the Iranian government indoctrinates its children, and hospitals because that’s where they treat Iranian soldiers injured in Israeli attacks. See, folks? They’re just trying to help. /s

This explains it in better detail than I could. It isn’t so much a single law, but rather a lot of different laws that all work together to ensure that Israel is given everything it could possibly need for its own defense…even bypassing normal regulatory measures in the process, as long as certain conditions are maintained.

Israel has invested tens of millions of dollars lobbying for, and helping to write, the legislation that guarantees their continuous access to weapons. A lot of it is written directly into defense spending bills that are essential for domestic defense spending as well. So, without a massive shift in policy at the legislative level to disentangle those priorities, that support is legally binding.

Aaaww…their first illegal action. How adorable.

When I read the, “things are going to change” line…I assumed he was saying that his current policy of kidnapping workers was the change in question.

He kind of rolled it into the statement he was making about ending “Biden’s open borders policy”, so it kind of felt like he was saying, no more letting immigrants have any options for sanctuary within the system. That’s what’s going to change, from now on. No?

C’mon guys…everyone knows he prefers, “God Emperor”.

So, just go into it with violence in mind, then? What advice is this really giving? Shoot first, because they’re just going to lie about it anyway?

Fuck that.

Defend yourself if you have to, but telling people to use violence, just makes what they say about protesters, true. Don’t validate them.

Even though it’s obviously illegal? JFC.

Is this real?

That IS technically what the 2nd amendment is for. “A well regulated militia…etc”.

Israel has already attacked Iran.