Not at all, they can still require apps to be signed, so long as you’re free to allow app installations. They’ll weasel out by saying the signing is for safety/security reasons, to avoid malware and shit.

You are utterly unable to engage with what someone actually says to you, aren’t you?

Is there an actual wiper-image of this? That’d be far more usable than a slowly-animated gif.

Can’t, all corporate hardware and their software, too. Not my problem, but also not my intellectual property being stolen to be used in AI, so eh, NotMyProblemException.

Yeah the actual production here is us now talking about it. And well, the rest of the internet. The wanker is not stupid, I give him that. He must have known that just filming stunt scenes isn’t good for clicks, but this is.

I love those “might”-headlines. Yeah sure it might. The Skyline 3 might come with an integrated railgun and a dyson sphere, sure.

Or it might not.

That reminds me of a friend back in WoW who said she once broke off a relationship after coming home from a holiday and finding out her boyfriend had become her girlfriend.

Yeah we already established in the premise I find them attractive. Of course I would.

Is it an EU thing that they included a link to do this directly in the announcement mail? Either way, thanks for posting this!

Fuuuuuck. There goes another business idea. 😂

I’d recommend webp

Everything supports it and it can be lossy or lossless as needed.

Watch some startup “invent” a revolutionary lossless format that discards some information.

8 minutes? Disappointing. Hope the nurse found someone better.

I think the fact that they are very very glacially slowly delivering on things at least, all the while self-discovering software development instead of learning it, that aggravates me even more. Bloober Team could finish this faster and more competently than these clowns…

And you can bet your ass that for how outdated it’ll look when it releases in 2035 or so, it’ll still chug at <30 FPS on your NVidia 35090.

You can just admit you were wrong, you know? Both about current legal cases and about how how proofs of negative claims are viewed in mathmatics particularly logic, and in philosophy. That’s okay. Sometimes we are wrong, and we learn from accepting that.

I don’t disagree Nintendo is a shithole company, after all. Just take it as a learning experience: More than one company can be shite at the same time.

You can’t prove a negative

*blinks*

You are calling me the “dumbass”, here? 😅 Both logic and philosophy say this perspective is wrong, and also, funnily enough, if this were true (as in, it’s not possible to proof a negative assertion in a burden-of-proof scenario) then that very claim could not be proven either? Because “You cannot prove a negative” is, in itself, a negative assertion.
Luckily for us this is of course wrong, and you can prove a negative. Especially in matters of fact, since you could find a list of current filings of Microsoft and hence show that no, of all their ongoing lawsuits, there are none that are targetting developers (which is not the case, it was easy enough to find two cases without digging any deeper).

And I mean, this doesn’t do shit to exhonorate Nintendo here, but let’s not pretend Microsoft and Sony aren’t constantly running hundreds of legal cases and multiple will be targetting developers of all sizes. They’re just avoiding big press about most of them.

It’s been a long time since I came across matroska files in numbers, but this is pretty cool to have.

I mean from how they speak and post, their ability for language is reduced to the Twitter-level of communication.