I’m a beginner. But painting the likeness of someone from your imagination is somewhat. Hmm. Magical, I guess, lol.

I can tell have this way about you. It’s so on the money. Your money

deleted by creator

I was just gaining insights. Thanks

Futher context. It’s an alternative to the standard model that seems to fit the planke data with two fewer parameters. This would need to be validated by numerous cosmologists, I would suppose. The cosmologists eho downloaded it does publish papers regarding alternatives to DM and DE. Some similarities, but the independent researcher has a vastly different model to the standard. It’s a fresh hypothesis. Not a tweak. By reading the cosmologists papers, I would wager it’s fits his work. The missing structure of it all. Or it’s nothing.

It cause severe mental stuff as well. I’m convinced.

I don’t think the algorithm is letting my art be seen. I mean pen doodles 50.- 100.likes. me 13

deleted by creator

Abortion fans are in the house.

Wow. I thought cringe was a feeling, not an actual person. Thanks, Lower Organism! My new friend the house plant

https://www.academia.edu/129622239/A_Resonant_Shell_Cosmology_A_Reflective_Dynamic_Boundary_as_an_Alternative_to_ΛCDM

That’s rad, dude. I wish I knew how to do that. Hey, dude I imagined a cosmological model that fits the data with two fewer parameters then the standard model. Planke data. I I’ve checked the numbers, but I don’t have the credentials. I need somebody to check it out. This is a it and a verbal explanation for the model by Academia.edu. It’s way easier to listen first before looking. I don’t want recognition or anything. Just for someone to review it. It’s a short paper. https://youtu.be/_l8SHVeua1Y

Yes. I was aware of that, but I was manipulated by an analog device

I NEED TO consult every LLM VIA TELEKINESIS QUANTUM ELECTRIC GRAVITY A AND B WAVE.

I think the best thing at this juncture is to ask an LLM WHAT THE TRUTH IS LOL

I’ll ask AI what’s really going on lolool.

I did dozens of times. Same calculations.

I’m a little confused after listening to a podcast with… Damn I can’t remember his name. He’s English. They call him the godfather of AI. A pioneer.

Well, he believes that gpt 2-4 were major breakthroughs in artificial infection. He specifically said chat gpt is intelligent. That some type of reasoning is taking place. The end of humanity could come in a year to 50 years away. If the fella who imagined a Neural net that is mapped using the human brain. And this man says it is doing much more. Who should I listen too?. He didn’t say hidden AI. HE SAID CHAT GPT. HONESTLY ON OFFENSE. I JUST DON’T UNDERSTAND THIS EPIC SCENARIO ON ONE SIDE AND TOTALLY NOTHING ON THE OTHER

It checked out. But, all six getting the same is likely incorrect?.

It was about all six models getting the same answer from different accounts. I was testing it. Over a hundred each same numbers