Anything but the metric system.

Agreed, she needs a statue of Edward Cullen created, to both remind her of her childhood cringe event and allow her to take it to the next level.

In the first few Assassin’s Creed games, they did use the idea of a Puppeteer system for the control scheme, although it wasn’t physics-based or anywhere near as hard as QWOP. Each of the controllers face buttons performed actions associated with each limb, and the right trigger would swap between low profile actions and high profile actions.

In the top right of the screen, there was always a UI element showing what the buttons did at that moment in that context, which might’ve been why you thought it was a QWOP style system. It’s not exactly what you were thinking of at the time, but you were closer than you realise.

My hypothesis is that they’re like The Suit by Scott Base.

Quaso

The enemy of my enemy has his uses, but that absolutely does not make him my friend.

Yeah, obscure interests are hardly a thing of the past. If anything it’s only gotten stronger, people of all ages can now be sucked so far down the fandom rabbithole that they lose sight of it being their obscure interest.

Although the way it used to be, kids would have access to one obscure thing, and so that’s their one chance at having an obscure interest. That’s changed, kids now get much wider choice.

Edit: Clarity

Measurehead, is that you?

This could be a useful way to describe an unopened Twix. But once it’s been opened, the direction of the Twix relative to the opening (with the text being at the top) matters more than the direction relative to the text.

Here’s some articles with the video the title seems to be referring to:

https://newsinisrael.co.uk/moshe-feiglin-on-channel-14-every-baby-in-gaza-is-an-enemy/

https://humanityrenewed.com/more-calls-for-genocide-and-ethnic-cleansing-on-israeli-television/

I think he’s a bot. The comment doesn’t even make sense, since OP’s from the same instance, and a cursory glance at his comment history only reinforces my suspicion.

Edit: Nevermind, OP’s from Lemmingsworld, not lemmyworld. And I wouldn’t recommend looking at this users comment history. It shows a sad and lowkey disturbing tale of constant serial rageposting and insulting random people, then blaming everyone and everything but himself whenever he gets any reply he doesn’t like (which would be most replies).

Panel 1: The cheetah(?) approaches the photographer and asks to see the photo they recently took of it.

Panel 2: The photographer shows the cheetah the photo.

Panel 3: The photo.

Panel 4: The cheetah disapproves of how goofy it looks in the photo and asks for it to be deleted.

You don’t have to fake a customer service smile to be friendly.

Edit: and you weren’t just saying “being nice to people is a good thing” though, were you? Maybe read your own comment and the replies instead of making up a strawman.

I was already almost always picking Luigi. Recent events have only solidified my choice.

Listening to Lemmy on Lemmy.

😂🤣😂EpicFunnyPage

The third movie was a little too shit for my taste. But when Shrek 2 came out in '04, I think Dreamworks really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole film has a clear, crisp narrative, and a new sheen of comedic timing that really gives the jokes a big boost. He’s been compared to Woody, but I think Shrek has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor.

You’ll never save Prince Uncle Horace. I, King Dragon, will strike you down.