IzzyScissor

Never thought I would see the day where Google crumbles, but they’re actively sprinting towards it now.

Seriously. The recent story of just how many people have died from the cops ‘giving them something to calm them down’ is insane. If you’re not my doctor, you don’t get to dose me with anything.

I remember one time when my dad renewed his car’s tags they misspelled his name on one of the forms and he only noticed after he was leaving.

It took another 30 minutes to sign paperwork confirming that (for example) ‘Austin’ and ‘Austyn’ are the same person, and that this was not intended to cause fraud. I can imagine someone seeing/experiencing that for the first time and thinking they found the perfect loophole.

Fantastic news.

Anti-Hamas rage bait. Article ACTUALLY says “there are “reasonable grounds” to believe that Hamas committed rape and “sexualised torture” during its attack in southern Israel on 7 October.”

From OCTOBER.

Israel murdered over a hundred people LAST WEEK who were starving and waiting in line for food and injured around 750 more, so why are we seeing an influx of articles making ‘reasonable assumptions’ against Hamas from 5 months ago? It still doesn’t justify Israel’s actions.

Oh, this happened in January before the whole Stephen King ‘deadnaming’ Twitter fiasco. I completely thought this was retaliatory at first.

Yeah, turns out moderating user generated content to guarantee it being safe for children is expensive.

https://crooksandliars.com/cltv/2024/02/black-conservative-federation

It’s only a little funny seeing just how many people in attendance were actually black.

I still want journalists to get definitive answers on things like, ‘Who gets custody?’ ‘How much child support is necessary for an embryo?’ ‘If life begins at conception, does this mean an embryo frozen for 21 years that is implanted and born can drink alcohol from a baby bottle since they’re technically ‘of age’?’

There are so many STUPID repercussions from this ruling, and there’s no logical explanation for it all. It’s the beginning of the end of the separation of church and state.

Yeah… almost like they’re stuck in a cycle of poverty and can’t save enough money for a down payment for a house either.

So ‘funny’.

The most terrifying aspect is that it isn’t just gay marriage at stake here - Interracial marriages, atheist marriages, inter-abled marriages… ALL marriages are at risk if a person you’ve never met won’t sign a piece of paper.

As someone who did, I understand the sentiment but it isn’t that easy. I have so many friends and family members who are stuck there because they can’t save enough resources to leave.

We should refer to him as a convicted rapist all the time.

lmao, no.

It was specifically written after the civil war so that the South could still technically have slavery, they just have to criminalize and convict a person first. It’s how we get the ‘war on drugs’ where even though black and white populations smoke around the same amount, black populations were criminalized FAR harsher, and sent to prison far more often. It’s exactly “Rules for thee, but not for me” on a grand scale where white people would likely ‘get a pass’ for their first arrest. That grace was not extended to black populations, and so we’re back at having slavery with extra steps.

It’s a nice thought that it just happened over time by accident, but in reality it was planned like this.

So, openly admitting it was “quid pro quo”. Cool.

From what I understand - the first action the bad actors are taking are releasing the family trees to “out” anyone with Jewish relatives.

So, just hate crimes to start.

Because rules are how society works. If both parties agree to throw out the rules… we don’t have a democracy anymore.

“So Mr. Chairman, you’re saying because you think Sen. Grassley violated the rule, you’re going to violate the rule?” [Sen. John Kennedy] asked.

“It’s called precedent, senator,” replied Durbin.

Can you explain why you put ‘diagnosed’ in quotes?

Firstly, your ‘instance’ is just like your email server. It doesn’t matter if it’s @yahoo.com or @google.com, I can still email you and you can respond. Some people even have their own servers.

Next, imagine if Facebook, Instagram and Twitter users could all follow each other’s posts. The posts are already pretty much the same but we just add @Facebook or @Twitter to the end. You could log in to one, but see posts from the others. The only difference is the layout and design of the interface, like the difference between ‘Gmail’ and ‘Outlook’.

You can also move between servers easily if you want. Sick of @Facebook? Move to @Instagram without losing followers.