https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yukigassen
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lockdowns
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_Age
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Terminal
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_cannabis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_cab
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_wage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_Air_Flight_072
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_version_history
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empire_of_the_Ants_(novel)

I only included pages from the English Wikipedia. There was quite a few visits to Wikipedia in my native language too.

Play store took it’s sweet time to give me the update, but now it finally did and I too can confirm the issue seems to have been resolved. I didn’t need to clear cache or anything like some of the others reported.

Thx for the quick fix!

Kinda interesting, in the pictures in the article everyone seems to have a yellow floaty thingy. Anyone know if they actually require everyone to use one or if it’s just a coincidence that everyone happened to have one when the pics were taken.

I’m having the same issue. After scrolling for a while, I get “Failed to load more posts. Try again?” Started happening today. First I thought maybe my instance is having problems but it seems the issue only happens with Voyager.

I’m using the beta version of the app too so maybe something is indeed broken in the latest beta?

Edit: Should have mentioned I’m on Android.

Nothing major, but I have two stories that have stuck with me. I’m not superstitious or anything, and obviously these are just coincidences, but it’s interesting how the human mind loves finding connections between things even when there aren’t any.

One morning in 2020, during the covid lockdowns, I woke up to the sound of a small bird pecking at my bedroom window. It was really going at it and wouldn’t fly away even after opening the blinds. For some reason, I wanted to take a picture of it, and just as I grabbed my phone, it rang and I got the news that my grandmother had passed away during the night. Right then, I noticed the bird flying away. My partner at the time insisted it was my grandma saying her final goodbyes. While I don’t believe that, the memory of that moment has stuck with me, and it still makes my eyes water a bit.

The second incident also involves a bird, funnily enough. A friend and I were driving to a national park for an overnight hiking trip when we accidentally drove over something on a small forest road. I didn’t see it, but my friend said it looked like a small bird. I wanted to stop and check, but my friend, who was driving, just kept going. I jokingly said something like "Now we have bad karma, and the whole trip will get ruined somehow.” And would you know it, that very same day an unexpected heatwave hit the area, making the entire hike pretty miserable. This has become a running joke between us, every time we go hiking, we joke about how everything will go fine, as long as we can get there without running over anything on the way.

That’s very useful, thx for the info. But comments don’t have that, for them you have to use the three-dot menu? And in there long pressing the share option doesn’t seem to do anything.

You might wanna go to Settings --> General --> Share Link Instance and change that to “Ask”. Then, when you select “Share” from the three-dot menu on any post or comment, you can choose between a link to your instance, the author’s instance, or the community’s instance. Finally, you can copy the link from the share dialog. At least, that’s how it works on Android.

When posting a link to comment, it makes most sense to me use the community’s instance. In this case: https://lemmy.world/comment/17923298

Kinda off-topic, but am I the only one who usually joins meetings five minutes early? I hate being late, and that way I give myself five minutes of peaceful troubleshooting time if my mic doesn’t connect, for example.

Thanks. This is kinda important info so I’ve edited my initial comment.

They are not saying anything on why they are removing it.

Jellyfin is dropping HTTPS support with a future update[…]

What’s the source for this? I wasn’t able to find anything with a quick google search

I see everyone in this thread recommending a VPN or reverse proxy for accessing Jellyfin from outside the LAN. While I generally agree, I don’t see a realistic risk in exposing Jellyfin directly to the internet. It supports HTTPS and certificates nowadays, so there’s no need for outside SSL termination anymore. (See Edit 2)

In my setup, which I’ve been running for some time, I’ve port-forwarded only Jellyfin’s HTTPS port to eliminate the possibility of someone ending up on pure HTTP and sending credentials unencrypted. I’ve also changed the Jellyfin’s default port to a non-standard one to avoid basic port-scanning bots spamming login attempts. I fully understand that this falls into the security through obscurity category, but no harm in it either.

Anyone wanna yell at me for being an idiot and doing everything wrong? I’m genuinely curious, as the sentiment online seems to be that at least a reverse proxy is almost mandatory for this kind of setup, and I’m not entirely sure why.

Edit: Thank you everyone for your responses. While I don’t agree with everything, the new insight is appreciated.

Edit 2: I’ve been informed that infact the support for HTTPS will be removed in a future version. From v10.11 release notes:

Deprecation Notice: Jellyfin’s internal handling of TLS/SSL certificates and configuration in the web server will be removed in a future version. No changes to the current system have been made in 10.11, however future versions will remove the current system and instead will provide advanced instructions to configure the Kestrel webserver directly for this relatively niche usecase. We strongly advise anyone using the current TLS options to use a Reverse Proxy for TLS termination instead if at all possible, as this provides a number of benefits

If you are in the UK (where lemmy.zip is geoblocked due to UK laws)[…]

That’s news for me. Anyone know what law(s) exactly they have problems with?

Obviously the orders are negotiated months beforehand and just published at the airshow for some free PR for both parties.

What if a bad actor acquires one of these once popular tracker domains? Could they somehow take advantage of it? For example, what if they make the tracker advertise a large number of “fake” peers that serve malware instead of the actual files? I only have a crude understanding of how BitTorrent works, so I’m not sure what kinds of protections, if any, it has against this type of attack.

Link to the free demo on Steam

They’re also not saying it couldn’t have happened, are they? They’re waiting for investigators to gather all the facts before making any statements, just like they should.

Meanwhile, we here on the internet are just speculating based on the limited information available (basically just the video footage). Based on the current information we have, my opinion is that pilot error is the most likely cause.

You’re free to disagree about the likelihood of different scenarios, but right now we have no evidence that makes the theory of the pilots accidentally retracting the flaps instead of the gear impossible or “absurd.” It’s really counterproductive to start ruling out scenarios without concrete proof.

He would be the perfect host for the show

I don’t get what you mean by “and no one figured that out yet.” As you said yourself, no one knows what happened yet. Pretty much all we have at this point are the videos, and all we can confirm from them is a rough flight path of the plane and that the landing gear remained down after what appeared to be a normal takeoff. I haven’t seen any footage that clearly shows the state of the flaps with any certainty, but please correct me if I’ve missed something.

In my mind, that leaves us with three possible scenarios:

• Pilot error (retracting the flaps instead of the landing gear)
• Dual engine failure at the critical moment (there’s no evidence of this in the videos, but also nothing ruling it out)
• Something else (we don’t know what we don’t know)

From the two scenarios (pilot error, engine failure) that fit the flight path from the videos, the option one seems more plausible to me. But that’s just my armchair opinion, it doesn’t mean anything. All we can really do is wait for the investigation and the preliminary report.

According to type rated pilots the 787 doesn’t allow you to retract flaps immediately in critical flight after takeoff.

That’s interesting. Do you have the source for that? I wasn’t able to find a definitive answer with google

There are minimum airspeeds the aircraft must reach before the flaps can be safely retracted. I don’t know the exact numbers, but assuming a standard flaps 5 takeoff for B787, retraction to flaps 1 would occur around 1000 ft by earliest, that’s typically 20 to 30 seconds after the takeoff.