• 0 Posts
  • 113 Comments
Joined 1 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月20日

help-circle

  • Or, you really enjoy a hobby but your hyperfocus makes you research the hobby instead of doing it. E.g. you like photography and your hyperfocus kicks in researching places to go take photos, or gear to buy… Or you spend hours choosing the best cycling route until it’s too dark or the weather changes and you go “What happened to my beautiful afternoon??”.

    My hyperfocus tends to kick in whenever the ADHD gremlin inside my brain chooses, not always when I’m doing whatever I enjoy. I wish that was always the case.












  • Jrockwar@feddit.uktoAI@lemmy.mlHow reliable are modern LLMs?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    22 天前

    The least unreliable LLM I’ve found by far is perplexity, in the Pro mode. (By the way, if you want to try it out, you get a few free uses a day).

    The reason is because the Pro mode doesn’t retrieve and spit out information from its internal memory bank, but instead, it uses that information to launch multiple search queries, then summarises the pages it finds, and then gives you that information.

    Other LLMs try to answer “from memory” and then add some links at the bottom for fact checking but usually Perplexity’s answers come straight from the web so they’re usually quite good.

    However, I still check (depending on how critical the task is) that the tidbit of information has one or two links next to it, that the links talk about the right thing, and I verify the data myself if it’s actually critical that it gets it right. I use it as a beefier search engine, and it works great because it limits the possible hallucinations to the summarisation of pages. But it doesn’t eliminate the possibility completely so you still need to do some checking.





  • It’s funny. BMW took an opposite approach to everyone else when it comes to EVs. I (mistakenly) thought they would fail.

    Ford, VW, Mercedes, etc. were developing specific platforms for electric vehicles, given that they are different enough architecturally that using the manufacturing processes meant for internal combustion engines wouldn’t be cost efficient. However, after the experiment that the i3 was, BMW decided it was more sensible to just reuse platforms from internal combustion engine vehicles for their new EVs.

    I thought this would be inefficient, besides not taking proper advantage of the packaging wins that an EV architecture allows.

    A few years in, and thanks to their strategy they’ve developed a big range of EVs at a comparatively lower cost. Nobody cares that the i4 doesn’t have a frunk, or that their platform wasn’t purposely designed for EVs. Even if the manufacturing cost is higher, having a smaller upfront cost has allowed them to move faster.

    Kudos to them for their success, even if it comes from playing it safe.



  • My partner and I got invited to a wedding with a funky, everything-goes sort of dress code. For £50 we bought enough clothes for two blade-runner-esque outfits (we added some bits of our own so the ensemble wouldn’t look too cheap) and a big goose plushie (bigger than an individual pillow). The goose was £14 and not cheaply made at all! That one was genuinely a nice suprise.


  • Jrockwar@feddit.uktoMemes@lemmy.mlZen Z
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 个月前

    Absolutely not comparable to floppy disks. The hands are a representation, not a technology. Technology-wise, most modern “analog” wristwatches are quartz, and therefore digital, not actually analog. Yet we choose to make them with hands because that provides a better representation of the passing of time.