• 2 Posts
  • 302 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 18th, 2026

help-circle






  • To understand the issue, I went back to a book published in 1954, 20 years before I was born: Peter Drucker’s “The Practice of Management.” Drucker explores the different roles inside every business, which I would categorize as builders, sellers and measurers.

    Measurers are also critical to a business, but different from the other two. The best are hard to find. They work tirelessly behind the scenes, don’t seek the recognition of a front-of-house role, and ideally have a perspective independent from the rest of the organization. Drucker argues that measuring business is important, but customers are earned through building and selling. The best businesses would maximize investment in those two functions.

    AI isn’t coming for builders or sellers, but it is coming for measurers. Tireless, independent, efficient and available, AI systems can now measure an organization with a level of objective detail and precision that was previously impossible even for the best employees.

    It’s surprising how typical, how mundane, the logic errors CEOs make are. This guy read a book that he admits was released (presumably he means as a signal of its timelessness) 20 years before he was born. It collapses everyone into three groups. He assumes this heuristic is both correct and accurate to modern times, simply because the words have meanings that attach to modern concepts.

    But builders in 1954 were making widgets and physical objects. Sellers were often in a store talking to customers who wanted to buy that object. Measurers were bean-counters, barely out of slide-rule days.

    All of these types of roles have updated and transformed to the point of being totally different, and now - like with Cloudflare - the main product is information (code and knowledge, packaged as Cloudflare’s site products). Builders, sellers and measurers all just interact with that information in different ways. Each one has different efficiencies and value.

    And here at least, assuming that AI is going to capture “measurers” more than others is not a smart CEO’s inspired leadership. It is a symptom of a brain that can’t adapt to the modern era.

    Indeed, why would he not assume that the “builders” will be replaced more easily, as most other big tech CEOs think? Isn’t Claude Code the one success story in a sea of AI losses in the billions? Presumably his product can’t infinitely scale, so why would he keep hiring into infinity? (Those assumptions supporting firing “builders” are wrong, of course, but are as valid as his wrong assumption.)

    Why would he not assume the “sellers” can be replaced - their entire job is chatting and collating information tailored to prompts as an intermediary, which is the entire purpose of LLMs? (Again, I don’t think they can be replaced, but again, it’s equally wrong in the ways he is wrong.)

    The problem, as always, is that CEOs never understand exactly what is happening on the ground. They need these heuristics to give themselves confidence that they understand the whole picture. The problem is at some point, they lose their humility, their connection to the people who are doing the work, enough to care. If Prince cared enough to think harder about what these “measurers” real value is, and what AI’s real competency is, 20% of the workforce might still have a job.



  • That is a worst case horror story that everyone should think about, and I’m not usually an optimist, but I don’t think it’s likely.

    Ultimately AI is a hype wildfire, and it will eventually run out of fuel - signs are already showing that happening as AI hyperscalers and vendors are ending investments, restricting access and raising prices to recoup unsustainable losses.

    At that point, I hope we stay sane and not jump at the first discounts, and just sit tight while prices return to normal. Prices need to fall heavily before we start supporting these AI-first companies again, or else we are going to lock ourselves into that AI-inflated price dystopia.



  • Goes without saying, but it’s incredibly hard to speak truth to power even knowing it would likely cost him the job he’s devoted his life to for decades. Most of us have already stopped trusting CBS News, but this is a big signal to all the regular folks that there’s political interference.

    The only thing that could make Pelley, Alfonsi and the other departed staff’s actions even better (which of course they don’t owe us, but just saying) would to be to start or join a different organization and keep their reporting alive. The biggest thing which we all still lose if they disappear is that their journalistic and ethical standards are that much harder to keep alive for the next generation.







  • I hope companies, senators, housemembers, politicians with any modicum of power are taking notes.

    Trump is a sociopath and follows standard abuser tactics. He will push things as far and as fast as you will allow. It usually doesn’t take much, in fact just a sharp needle, to pop a trial balloon. Maybe going forward you all can do literally do just the absolute minimum of your duty to the Constitution and your constituency, politicians?