That’s friction right away, but the resulting social change would be pretty interesting to see

That’s alright. We don’t have to mean the horizon of modern knowledge, when we say people have the opportunity to self-educate with the latest research. Even if we stick to popularized-and-mostly-true digestible information, there’s still a useful line to draw here.

Sure. Does the use of a word cause harm? Okay, bad word to use.

Does the use of a word alleviate harm? Great word.

The fact that’s a dangling modifier is so perfect

The good thing is that upstanding people can now have more license to morally condemn with full confidence. (You know, like MAGA does constantly without any basis)

She wasn’t scared

The reply correctly highlighted the idea that AI is ‘impressive’. It wasn’t a denial of your critiques of AI.

A more accurate analogy: The earth is round and germs make people sick

Stanford

Same reason the BBB funded them by over $10,000 per undocumented ‘target’, making one of the most well-funded armies in the entire world.

It’s not meant to operate as a deportation force, it is a paramilitary meant to serve the administration’s corrupt whim.

My bad on the phrasing. I meant individual acts and actors, and spoke too broadly.

deleted by creator

Yup. The admin knows that a blue wave is an existential threat to corruption. They have no interest in allowing a free and fair election. Every fight to protect democracy is now critical, from here until Nov 2026.

Every month, they’ve committed further abominations against law and process. 12 more to go.

That’s a lot of words for a post that doesn’t contain a single substantive rebuttal to anything it’s complaining about.

Also, the phrase “entitled to their opinion” has almost never been applied to matters of opinion, and needs to die in a fire yesterday. Apparently that’s an opinion I’m entitled to.

Not lawful. No amount of acknowledging the existence of mechanisms of law determines one’s lawful alignment. A chaotic person isn’t blind to the presence of law, they just don’t feel internally compelled by it.

Strongly disagree with ‘evil’, too, if the act has a meaningful chance of helping somebody innocent.

Next-best strategy: make the set of guests who have to be moved arbitrarily sparse, so that 0% of the hotel’s guests need to be bothered. Oh dear, that’s still infinity of them.