No, because there isn’t a statement yet.

Neither is the moon

It would be a lot brighter if you opened up the aperture

But … it’s clearly illuminated

If it weren’t for double standards, they’d have no standards at all.

And yet here you are.

Rizzputin?

Looks like a small lump of green putty I found in my armpit one midsummer morning

My stinky what?

Oh sure, you get up votes when you say it

Allow me to further attempt to better communicate the key points in the timeline.

The time of purchase is well before the statement date, which precedes the due date.

ToP --- SD --- DD

The “expected” behavior is to pay the statement balance between the statement date and the due date.

What I’m seeing in this post is that people want a good score that is supposed to reflect their ability to pay bills on time without explicitly paying bills on time. Simple tracking one’s spending and paying off credit card statements and they come in is a great way to build credit, but it does require a minimal amount of fiscal responsibility in the form of tracking one’s own spending habits over the course of a single month.

No, they were trying to pay down the balance after each purchase, well before a statement was issued.

They use it to demonstrate how the rules do not bind them.

So, nothing new

Now it’s just a thing from the movies

What I wouldn’t give for such an out

*Pedophile Donald Trump

What I’m seeing in the comments of this post is that people expect a good credit score, which is supposed to track how reliable you are at paying bills, without simply paying bills on time.

No, the standard is to pay the statement balance by the due date in order to not accrue interest.

So it sounds like the solution to increasing the score tracking how good you are at paying bills when they are due is to pay bills when they are due?