I agree with this article. Locally we have had themost success with Barbecue cookouts and Karaoke nights. People like participatory fun, and it builds a sense of community. I also like group singing, such as rounds, which can also bring a sense of cohesion and unity.
That looks like possibly the most awesome job imaginable
Big win for Miami being free of him
AOC stands for Alexandria ocasio capitulates again and again to Zionism and Yankee imperialism
There actually is a strong profit incentive though it’s a significantly longer term than investment than most of modern capitalism. They don’t want forests, they want they want plantations. They are working on changing the nature of the forest and the land to make it a more valuable asset for private capital. It should be clear how this is related to the planned privitization of the forest service
bombs Latvian fuel depot which has been to disused since 1993
Take that, perfidious ruskies
Adding a fourth pedal which just actuates the brake light without braking
Since the trump attacked Iran, I have only bought gas at the reservation or at this one extremely sketchy station with equipment which looks like it hasn’t been replaced since Jimmy Carter was president, which is widely speculated to be a money laundering front. Only places I can afford gas anymore
I enjoy having older men be simultaneously oggling me while being visibly uncomfortable in the pool locker room. When our version of the great proletarian cultural revolution comes and these old men are reeducated, this is one thing I will miss.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/morocco-missing-soldier-body-recovered-lamont-key-african-lion/
Two us soldiers apparently drowned in the ocean in morrocco during a training exercise
This is interesting info, thank you.
Groupings of people can just be reactionary as fuck do to their economic position.
maybe explicitly name the class dynamic at play instead of using generational politics as a bad proxy. Homeowners are generally reactionary due to their class interests. Honeowners tend to be older. There is no magical brain change which makes one reactionary upon reaching a certain age.
Similarly israelis are generally reactionary due to their material conditions as active settlers within the political economy of Zionism. Not due to any magic quality of theirs as the antisemites would imply
If you build more housing, housing prices will drop, that’s bad for white boomers, homeowners, but it would be good for broke ass millennials and Gen Zers. renters. But boomers homeowners fight tooth and nail to prevent new housing to protect their property values. A lot of them aren’t even subtle about it.
In 
and other western states homeowners tend to be older. However using age as a proxy for a class dynamic is inaccurate.
This is a really good line of argument. I would add, think about libya after western intervention caused the state to collapse. The result was not the flourishing of feminist and liberatory movements, but the regression of social progress in a warlord society. That would be a likely outcome were the West to be successful in bringing down the Iranian state. Unfortunately, us-israeli aggression has probably put back feminist struggles in Iran by decades.
You have drawn a false dichotomy. The people whose bigoted and reactionary views we are patiently trying to challenge and correct are also the elements of the multinational proletariat who want to overcome oppression with us. That’s why they are coming to our organizing spaces when invited. They come as imperfect humans just as we are, and unfortunately that means they frequently bring reactionary ideas.
Where are these revolutionary masses who have no bigoted views whatsoever?
Explaining things, especially things people have been primed to hate, is a difficult skill. It takes practice and likely a lifetime to master
True. Many Christians too love the purity testing with their understanding of sin.
I really appreciate your framing around empathy I think that makes sense
Interesting read but I ultimately don’t agree with it. I would argue that focusing on and opposing the physical infrastructure related to an industry people opposed is far more productive than focusing on federal policy for a nascent popular movement. I still think a lot of work is needed before an anti-AI movement is genuinely threatening, but a movement that threatens the vital infrastructure of its enemy and thus has the potential to understand things in terms of supply chains represent strategies with some potential.
Secondly I don’t agree with the premise of the argument that ecological impacts are overstated. All ecological impacts of AI slop generators and the data centers and power plants necessary to run them are objectively luxury emissions. Even if they are less significant than, say, those ecological impacts produced in the steel making industry (unsure if this specific example is correct, fairly immaterial) steel is actually significantly useful to humanity so the discussion of how to reduce emissions is qualitatively different.