If the plants could just tell me what they want that would be great
If the plants could just tell me what they want that would be great
Well… that, and one nucleus splitting in half wouldn‘t start a chain reaction in a cucumber, and therefore not release a macroscopically noticeable amount of energy.
Three searches later and I understand that ship here does not refer to a transport vessel
WHAT „IN ALL CAPS“? I CA’NT HEAR YOU!!1
ANYWAYS, I KNOW MFER‘S FROM THE PACK USE CAPS TO BE BETTER UNDERSTOOD, AS SOME MEMBERS ARE HARD OF HEARING!
Naja, die Gleise hängen ja noch in der Luft, deshalb ist so eine Schwebebahn noch eine der naheliegendsten Optionen zur Wiederbelebung des ÖPNVs auf dieser Brücke
Ich möchte auch mit so wenig Aufwand so glücklich sein wie du im Leben.
It‘s also written in the profile picture of the account :)
Haha, a reference to Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy!
That depends: In a certain way, we are already 4D creatures, with three spatial and one time dimension. However, in these contexts it‘s often useful to only refer to spatial dimensions. The 4D creature then has 4 spatial dimensions, and shares our time dimension.
But maybe its four spatial dimensions are our three spatial dimensions plus our time, and its time is something else completely? Then, by rotating you, it could place your head at a different time than your feet. But that also breaks causality and stuff.
Is this post about gastritis? What are we uniting about here?
Me pretending not to be looking for a place to vomit, just in case
Your wish can be arranged 🪄
— The mosquitoes
The connection to nature and the universe stops once mosquitoes enter the picture
In particular when referring to humans, the definition of sex is ambiguous, as is the term “biological male”. And I think this problem is intrinsic: Gender and sex are complicated (with many different markers which may be congruent for many people, but are not for trans and intersex people), and the usefulness of categories depends on context. For example, in a dating context, gender might be a useful category. In a medical context, sex is not a useful category for trans and intersex people: It’s not sufficient information, and sometimes ambiguous.
I agree that it would be nice to have other words than for XY/XX chromosomes (or small vs large gametes), this would make the language more exact and inclusive. However, I (and others) dislike the term “biological male”, because I think it exists only to create a category that equates cis men with trans women. Even if we agree on defining “biological male” as a person having XY chromosomes, in a sports context this is an unhelpful category because there are large differences between XY cis men and XY trans women. When there is apparently so much concern for fairness and safety, why not ask the big questions: How can we make sports inclusive, safe and fun for everyone (including trans people!), regardless of genetics? Are sex or gender useful categories to separate competition — or are there other, more useful markers? (And maybe even: Are international competitions as we have them now a desirable system?)
Hej, I‘ve seen quite a few comments using weird expressions to refer to trans women here, so to clarify, a trans woman is not:
A trans woman is:
Just use the words trans woman and cis woman, it‘s concise, correct and respectful. I‘m not saying that there are no differences between trans women and cis women, but simply that trans women are women. If you disagree with that, go watch ContraPoints or PhilosophyTube.
Consequently, the international cricket council should call it the elite cis women‘s game from now on, that would just be consistent.
Insbesondere 1TL Flohsamenschalen aufgelöst in Wasser wurden mir von Ärzten empfohlen.