• 8 Posts
  • 1.4K Comments
Joined 2 年前
cake
Cake day: 2023年6月9日

help-circle




  • A dog without leash shows that the owner hasn’t bothered taking dog training classes or in the case of my country that they haven’t bothered learning the law. If they can’t be bothered to do that, I worry that they are not responsible enough to take care of the dog, and they shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog. Dog ownership ought to require a license or mandatory training.

    The person using the perfume might also not even know about the issue, but in that case, I don’t think it makes sense to blame the consumer. There are simply too many types of products that are potentially dangerous when used wrong. Perhaps the seller ought to have warned about it, but I doubt that would make much difference. You can still be upset about it being produced. Lots of things are like that.

    Sometimes you can blame the consumer and sometimes you can’t.


  • If you’re a mathematician how can you be dissing 5 like that?

    Less than? Hell no.

    5 is soo much more and soo many things that 25 isn’t and never will be.

    Without 5 you wouldn’t even have 25. Some might even say that 5 is the root of 25. Show some respect for the roots.

    Not only is 5 a beautiful prime number, it’s also the perfect number for a geometric shape. Everyone knows what a pentagon looks like. The Pentagon even named their institution as that. They didn’t name it after 25. Who the hell has ever heard of the icosikaiopentagon? Nobody, that’s who.

    Look at the American flag. It has 50 stars. Guess which shape they have? That’s right, each of the 50 states have stars with 5 points. Exactly 0 of them chose to have a 25 pointed star.

    You know what a bad number is? Yes: 25.

    25 is a shitty composite number. It’s shitty because it’s not even good at being a composite number; having only a measly 3 factors: One, itself and 5 (of all things, duh…)

    That’s because it’s square and boring. Does it even look square to you? This uneven 25 is supposedly a square. I never made a square of 25 things. What’s the fucking point in that? If I had to make a square for any purpose whatsoever, I’d definitely chose a better number with many more factors, so I could actually use the squaredness to divide things and mark mid points and what not. 4 is a square. 16 is a square. They’re so much better at being square than 25, because you can cut them in half and make a grid with a midpoint.

    So, yeah yeah, there are probably other numbers out there greater than 5, but it sure as fuck is not 25.


  • Norway did it in 2015, and it seems to have been a success.

    There has been surprisingly little debate about it here in Denmark. I haven’t heard a single argument against it.

    It should be noted that the draft is for training only, and that it’s possible for pacifists to opt out of the military training by doing work for other institutions.

    Personally I think it might be a great help for modernizing the military, because they’ll need to rethink the old “one size fits all” procedures.







  • Art has always had that issue. Is a potato print worse than a hand drawn figure?

    Sometimes you need to know the material or technique to appreciate the effort.

    It also applies outside of art. It’s not always the end product that is important. We can appreciate things for being more difficult than necessary. Like the game Roller Coaster Tycoon being impressive because it was coded in assembly, or the Olympic guy who no-scoped in the shooting competition etc.

    If the AI prompt is the effort, it should be appreciated as such, instead of comparing the end product against other techniques. We also don’t compare airbrushed grafitti artwork to oil paintings, because even if the end product of both is a neat picture, it’s impossible to judge against each other.








  • The caps was a problem yes. Not just littering, but also in sorting for recycling, where they’d often end up in the wrong place.

    It obviously depends on where and how it’s done, but the thing I’ve heard is that due to (the lack of) weight and size the bottle caps would end up in the paper badges, which would ruin the paper from being recycled. It’s better if it follows the bottle. PET bottles (including caps) are shredded, washed and used for new bottles.

    Same thing happened to the pull tabs on aluminium cans. Those used to be separate too.