I did mean to reply to your comment. Just trying to say that I don’t need 2nd homes to be taxed much more higher that 1st homes if the issue can be fixed without getting to that point. Although it shouldn’t be off the table if it’s necessary to guarantee people can have access to homes.
- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 25th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
It’s not unreasonable, but if after taxing 3rd and 4th homes (etc.) to oblivion the issue persists, then also second homes should be taxed high. I truly believe that extreme would not be needed once it’s made humanely forbidden to own multiple homes without intention of ever living in them.
Worth adding that it should not be the number of homes what should be taxed, but based on the market value of those properties.
I will not watch ads. That’s the first, unbreakable premise. If the service does not provide videos, I leave the service.