Interfering by supporting progressive currents would only stabilize the system. But the plan is to destabilize the world hegemon, the US, in order to establish multipolarity instead of unipolarity. Conservative policies will destabilize the system because of their regressive nature and therefore enable the deconstruction of the world’s hyper-aggressive US dictatorship.
Not that I support any specific thing or country, but that’s my attempt of an explanation. Don’t shoot me.
Holy disinformation, dude, wtf!
Being pro-fascism is also anticapitalist
History shows us the opposite: fascist regimes worked hand-in-hand with big business. IBM helped organize the Holocaust through data system, Mercedes-Benz used over 30,000 forced laborers in their factories, and major corporations like Ford, GM, and IG Farben made massive profits from Nazi war production. Rather than destroying capitalism, fascist “corporatism” actually destroyed labor unions while preserving private property and business profits. As Britannica notes, fascist economic programs “favored the wealthy far more than the middle class and working class” — their anti-capitalist rhetoric was just propaganda to win support, not actual policy. The reality is that fascism represents capitalism’s authoritarian mode during crisis, not its replacement.
And that’s not even the kind of critical analysis a socialist would put forward.
Here’s a long-winded diatribe just for you. I hope your attention span will manage.
with each and every person
Everyone … in this thread, in which you inserted yourself? Bohoo. After I was offline for a couple of hours, iiiimagiiine that!
All you managed until now is complain and showcase your self-proclaimed lack of imagination.
Figure this: You’ve got no devotion, imagination for other perspectives, because all you do is consume western viewpoints in the few hours of each day, in which you are free not to fight for your existence. But imagine that, there‘s a whole world out there, and there do exist diverging opinions. I know, it‘s hard when you‘re trapped in capitalist realism (there‘s a book on that, a suggestion).
And you use the time to hang out with fascists and wanna-be fascists, ranting about a perceived enemy, the authoritarian left. Dude, you’re off the deep end.
Btw, which country am I devoted to, please tell me! China? Because I don’t put up with goat’s bullshit? You might just be an idiot.
Authoritarian opinions are not worthy of being discussed. Just like I don’t give two fucks what a Nazi says, I also give no fucks what authoritarians say.
That’s an unworthwhile authoritarian opinion.
So you’re of the enlightened centrist kind of flavor, equating nazism or fascism with communism, believing in horse shoe theory, fearing anything too far off of status quo?
What’s your idea how fascism rises? What is your utopia? Why are you participating in a community based on gossip, propaganda and on hate towards an outgroup? Where is your engagement against right wing extremism? Or is it the left in particular and your commentary about nazis was merely lip service?
How many months old does my account have to be, before you stop talking like a conspiracy theorist?
And why do you think “If you like them so much, why don’t you go live there?” is in any way some kind of clever stance? Don’t you like dissenting opinions? You want them gone?
It’s true, that quite a few comments are here, it’s because you’re all such a reasonable bunch of nice folks. I want to know what makes you tick — it’s a bleak picture, tho.
Okay, quite a few rage-filled generalizations and half-truths. It sure helps with the anger, I imagine. So, you’re a proud, blood and soil Ukrainian nationalist, would that be a good description of you?
Can you tell me, what you mean when you call people “tankie roaches”, so we’ve got the same basis? What is a tankie in your mind? Why are they roaches? And why are you using this kind of hate speech towards them as a group? Come on, give an actual answer, less yapping, more substance.
Thanks for your comprehensive answer, lol.
The third one is not the same account. Is it the same user? You tell me, you’re the mod.
So you actually managed to do moderation stuff and banned the fascist for a whole week, congratulations. I am indeed a bit surprised, gj!
How did that came to be? Because every time I pointed out their language, you ignored it, even called me unhinged for articulating a thorough critique. So you didn’t act on the user spewing hate speech, but on the user confronting you with your ignorant inaction. I don’t see how you’re fit for the job, lol.
Regarding the third example: instead of acting on the hate speech for which the user got their comment deleted (they openly fantasized about scenarios on how to kill a whole group of people), you used your energy to smudge the meaning of ableism in order to defend their post complaining about it. You’re still a shady and dishonest human being. And I am sorry, but that’s what I’m getting from your behaviour.
So, what brought you so far to actually ban a fascist for a week, what did he actually say? Because the instances I showed you obviously weren’t bad enough for you to act on it.
You keep using dehumanizing language. Tankies are not cheering on any Ukrainian death or the war efforts of either side, like you expressed somewhere else. Your hate is either misdirected or ideological.
Okay, so, here, I bothered. Now show me how you’re not answering any of my arguments in regards to hate speech and distract from the inherent toxicity of your community, which you facilitate (might have to read context, don’t pretend the infos aren’t there):
Three cases, where I confronted you with that, every time you avoided positioning yourself and distracted. Within a couple of weeks, in an almost dead community. Maybe you should get your head checked, if you can’t remember these confrontations. Last time I’ll answer any of your “show me” questions as I regard them as unserious distractions now.
Let’s see how you’ll not do it again, this time. Am off for now, tho. Take your time, understand the critique, drink a tea, reflect, drink another tea.
Dude, it’s alright, this is getting too dumb now. You cherrypick the most irrelevant point and it’s not even a good counter.
The fact that you always end up boring me to death, leaves me thinking, that you are indeed just really, really ignorant and maybe, just maybe not a propagandist. Hooray.
I’m saying that your “independent” label is worth nothing.
No, I’m saying you’re a funny guy.
That’s what he does, tho. If I do bother complying, he wouldn’t engage with the actual arguments or critique. That’s what I’m referencing and that’s also why I won’t play that stupid game. Tried a few times, it’s a useless endeavour.
I wonder if you actually read the stuff you link. I guess not, because it’s enough to look valid and well sourced in order to satisfy your loyal users. The few.
Just so it‘s clear: You posted an RFA article to spread some sinophobic propaganda. That‘s what I critiqued in the first paragraph of my inital answer. There were a couple more paragraphs.
But we‘re really busy now going back and forth on a validity of the claim if RFA is a US propaganda tool. And that‘s not even a controversial statement. But you‘ve got nothing and you need to cling onto that point.
Anyway, you know what else is independent? The CIA. You wouldn‘t argue that they are acting independent from or against the interests of the US of A, wouldn‘t you?
As mentioned previously in the Wikipedia article you linked it’s clear, that Trump thinks they‘re a hindrance to his power grab, because the Board was stacked with Biden appointees.
The insteresting part however is, how you need to twist yourself to argue that this media outlet is not what it was meant to be from its inception. That‘s just ridiculous and lays bare your propgandist nature. You‘re denying facts and not the first time, tho, so there‘s a pattern.
RFA was established by the US International Broadcasting Act of 1994 with the stated aim of “promoting democratic values and human rights”, and countering the narratives and monopoly on information distribution of the Chinese Communist Party, as well as providing media reports about the North Korean government.
The other interesting part is, how you try to uphold any validity of US law or moral standards, which since Trump started his second term are under attack from the current autocratic and fascist reconstruction. You. Are. A. Ridiculous. Propagandist.
To guarantee the freedom and impartiality of RFA, there is the USAGM and the firewall and laws.
Or really just stuck cognitively, a useful idiot, if you really believe that.
And I‘ll call you out on it, any time I‘m bored and see your dumb takes.
I do, too. Let’s wait together 😘
As I said, failing.
Why you asking me about internal US affairs? The actual question is how it’s independent, if their financials are in direct dependance of the US government? What would you call a Chinese or Russian media outlet openly funded by their own governments? Oh, because democracy vs authoritarianism? lol. You keep embarrassing yourself, again.
It’s a rhetorical question, tho. The actual actual question is, why is that the one thing you get stuck on, when I gave you so much more to talk about. And you accompany it with some very nice “look what the tankies do” yapping.
Do you’ve actually got something?
Kay, thanks for the feedback, I guess.
Consider this: I’m not an alt. I spent more time writing with your favorite mod here, than I did reading or writing stuff on .ml. Because he’s a dishonest red scare propagandist fishing for libs. Now process this: You’re in a reactionary, progagandist community with a slant for hate speech towards people you deem political opponents. Nice place to hang out in, really.
Read my post history in this community, if your memory is really that bad. Stop bothering me with busy tasks.
But your memory isn’t that bad, right? It’s just the dumb distraction game you play when you’re confronted.
I invite you to be more honest with one another!
Can you explain, how that’s weird?