• 0 Posts
  • 18 Comments
Joined 11 天前
cake
Cake day: 2025年6月5日

help-circle

  • I dunno, I think he looks good. He has noticeably more muscle than the average guy on the street, and I’d imagine that if he didn’t work out he’d look worse with general flabbiness.

    I had a similar build in my late 20’s. At one point, I had just started dating someone new, and I said something self deprecating or playful about my own body, and she outright scoffed at me, and blurted out “what the fuck are you talking about, you’ve got an amazing body” and it was just the little jolt of self esteem boost I didn’t know I was looking for.

    Understanding the difference between bodies one would have working out for a year versus not working out that year is important. It’s still a significant difference that people notice, even if there’s another significant difference between the one-year guy and the professional fitness model in the magazines.



  • Week 3 of 5/3/1 with training maxes of deadlift/squat/bench of 385/335/180 lbs.

    I was coming off of some mild illness that left me with no appetite all weekend, and I was definitely dehydrated coming into the week.

    Deadlift: I hit 5 reps of 370 lbs on my 1+ set. Didn’t love that, but I went for a joker set anyway and did 2 reps of 405.

    Squat: Warmed up with the wrong bar (25 kg instead of 45 lbs), started to get confused why it felt so heavy on my 5-rep set. Double checked and switched over to a 45-lb bar. For my 1+ set, I did 6 reps of 320 lbs, then a joker set of 3x350.

    Bench: Did 5x170 on my 1+ set, did a joker set of 2x190. Felt ok. Accessory work after felt pretty good, though. Not sure what to make of that.

    Overall, I’m a little bit disappointed with the reps I managed on these workouts. Can’t tell how much was loss of sleep, dehydration, illness, whatever, but I think I wasn’t 100% this week. Still, I think I’m ready to try to move up by 20 lbs on deadlift/squat training max and 10 lbs on bench, as I recover and should feel much better next week than I did this week.


  • Standard way to talk about weight includes the bar weight (usually 45 lbs or 20 kg, but I’ve seen others out there).

    It’s not a big deal when you’re just tracking your linear progress, as long as you’re consistent, but it’s still helpful to include the bar weight when talking to other people (who will expect the bar weight to be included), and if you get later into more advanced lifting programs that prescribe certain percentages of some reference weight.

    Barbell arithmetic becomes second nature after you’ve been doing it a while, too.


  • Everybody’s punching up.

    The diversity in preferences makes “up” impossible to define and order consistently between people. If you take a survey of a population for an ordered ranking, in desire ability as potential spouses, of a particular sample set, you might get wildly different rankings.

    And then those same people might rank things differently depending on who they would most want to have a one night stand with.

    Even laying out specific physical characteristics and asking about attractiveness will get those isolated features ranked differently. Heterosexual men will disagree on whether it is attractive, unattractive or neutral for a woman to be:

    • Being very tall
    • Being very short
    • Having an athletic build
    • Having pale skin
    • Having curly hair
    • Having tattoos
    • Having a Ph.D.
    • Speaking multiple languages
    • Being Christian
    • Being vegetarian

    We’re all just looking for compatibility. What that means will vary from person to person, and what is very attractive to one person might be a huge turn off to another.

    I’m generally of the view that you want to be with someone whose unique traits are positive to you, and who sees your unique traits as positives, too. That way both can fall within that stable equilibrium of both believing that they’ve married “up.”





  • Predate rationalism? Modern rationalism and the scientific method came up in the 16th and 17th centuries, and was built on ancient foundations.

    Phlogiston theory was developed in the 17th century, and took about 100 years to gather the evidence to make it infeasible, after the discovery of oxygen.

    Luminiferous aether was disproved beginning in the late 19th century and the nail in the coffin happened by the early 20th, when Einstein’s theories really started taking off.

    Plate tectonics was entirely a 20th century theory, and became accepted in the second half of the 20th century, by people who might still be alive today.




  • Science is a process for learning knowledge, not a set of known facts (or theories/conjectures/hypotheses/etc.).

    Phlogiston theory was science. But ultimately it fell apart when the observations made it untenable.

    A belief in luminiferous aether was also science. It was disproved over time, and it took decades from the Michelson-Morley experiment to design robust enough studies and experiments to prove that the speed of light was the same regardless of Earth’s relative velocity.

    Plate tectonics wasn’t widely accepted until we had the tools to measure continental drift.

    So merely believing in something not provable doesn’t make something not science. No, science has a bunch of unknowns at any given time, and testing different ideas can be difficult to actually do.

    Hell, there are a lot of mathematical conjectures that are believed to be true but not proven. Might never be proven, either. But mathematics is still a rational, scientific discipline.


  • Got me a new Lemmy account, now that lemm.ee is shutting down. But I’m @exasperation@lemm.ee, back with a 5/3/1 question.

    As background, when I started this program 2 weeks ago my training maxes were set to:

    Bench: 180 lbs
    Squat: 335 lbs
    Deadlift: 385 lbs

    I’m going into my first 1+ week and I’m confident I’ll be able to bust past 5-8 reps on most of the 1+/95% sets this week, based on my 10-rep sets at 90% this past week.

    So I have to ask: what’s the protocol for joker sets? I know Wendler kinda hates them, but I’m still kinda convinced I might have selected too low of a training max.

    If I bang out 6-8 reps of my 95%, should I add 10% and attempt 1+ reps of 105%? What about 115%?

    Or am I just getting ahead of myself, and shouldn’t push those limits until I get comfortable with the program?