Well, she’s actually on the same page. Machado has supported an American military intervention to oust the Maduro government.

Isn’t it anti-Semitic to call a Jew a Nazi?

No, I didn’t. In the USA the only candidates on the ballot are approved by the party. Look into Bernie Sanders’ 2016 campaign to find out how it works.

Hey, check this out, you might find it interesting. From Parenti’s Contrary Notions:

If what passes for objectivity is little more than a culturally defined self-confirming symbolic environment, and if real objectivity—whatever that might be—is unattainable, then it would seem that we are left in the grip of a subjectivism in which one paradigm is about as reliable (or unreliable) as another. And we are faced with the unhappy conclusion that the search for social truth involves little more than choosing from a variety of illusory symbolic configurations. As David Hume argued over two centuries ago, the problem of what constitutes reality in our images can never be resolved since our images can only be compared with other images and never with reality itself.

Good point

Sure, objective morality is the belief that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of individual opinions or cultural beliefs, that moral truths exist independently and can be universally recognized. The second question I haven’t the slightest idea, but it would be interesting to find out.

I don’t have a position, I was asking a question.

the world doesn’t even have objective morality

Deductions based on subjective information got you here. Or did you objectively observe (through, for example, objective experimentation) that there is no objective morality?

That’s what therapygary was trying to tell you, but not sure why they expected your subjective experience to realize the contradiction it itself is based on, lol.

Making a meme where your position is in the ‘right’, doesn’t make it true or even sensical.

I see, thanks for spelling it out for me!

Oh, I see. Thanks.

The US economy? How do you figure that?

Not even very good land:

Russia has been facing severe environmental issues, with the country’s Natural Resources Ministry naming 35 cities and towns with dangerously high air pollution levels. The country’s air pollution is largely attributed to industrial activity and vehicular traffic, with over 200 cities exceeding pollution limits. The Krasnoyarsk region has the highest air pollution level, with the city of Norilsk being the worst offender, releasing 1,787,000 tons of pollutants into the air. Other major cities like Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, and Volgograd also experience high concentrations of air pollution. Water pollution is also a serious concern, with 75% of surface water and 50% of all water in Russia contaminated. The country’s soil degradation, nuclear waste storage, and deforestation further contribute to its environmental challenges.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68120973

Not sure what they’re on about.

This is an interesting point, but what are you saying? Sorry, I’m a bit dense.

As an aside- does the article’s source (thecanary.co) have anything to do with Canary Mission? I would assume not, based on the content, but what’s with the common bird theme?

Great points, I like it. Someone else pointed out that perhaps there’s no objective morality, but perhaps another explanation is that there are no individuals, that’s why it seems like that.

Hmm, that’s a weird opinion. What are you assuming “my position” is?

You mean your subjective experience?