

What do you think about the guardian
What do you think about the guardian
This all sounds like it could have been in a Sealab episode…
I lived in a properly fluoridated region and have not had any!
Ignore anecdotes kids and use statistics!
I don’t think that’s what they are saying. It’s not that you can’t now, it’s that initially people did need to use a lot of data. Then they found tricks to improve training on less, but these tricks came about after people saw what was possible. Since they initially needed such data, their argument goes, and we wouldn’t have been able to improve upon the techniques if we didn’t know that huge neutral nets trained by lots of data were effective, then subsequent models are tainted by the original sin of requiring all this data.
As I said above, I don’t think that subsequent models are necessarily tainted, but I find it hard to argue with the fact that the original models did use data they shouldn’t have and that without it we wouldn’t be where we are today. Which seems unfair to the uncompensated humans who produced the data set.
I think his argument is that the models initially needed lots of data to verify and validate their current operation. Subsequent advances may have allowed those models to be created cleanly, but those advances relied on tainted data, thus making the advances themselves tainted.
I’m not sure I agree with that argument. It’s like saying that if you invented a cure for cancer that relied on morally bankrupt means you shouldn’t use that cure. I’d say that there should be a legal process involved against the person who did the illegal acts but once you have discovered something it stands on its own two feet. Perhaps there should be some kind of reparations however given to the people who were abused in that process.
You would imagine there would be a clause in the contract for exactly this scenario. If there’s not, it’s going to be a common one in contacts going forward…
In NY state, murder of the first degree is reserved for murder against a police officer or something related. So not an average civilian
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_in_New_York_law?wprov=sfla1
“Don’t completely disapprove” might be better phrasing
This is where I get mine from: https://www.tea-and-coffee.com/buy-tea/location/assam-tea
Very reasonable, especially when you compare it to equivalent quality coffee beans. And you don’t need the equipment to go with it …
Try a single estate Assam, it’s what it’s made out of, but better
Mate, you can just put your finger over the solar panel until it slowly gets strangled
What if you are practicing? Can you start slow on the hard bits or do you have to get it right straight away?
Oh, I down graded to arch because I couldn’t be bothered with Gentoo any more
If it were sanctioned by the league of women voters I’d be happy, otherwise not really worth it
Which is why it’s important to put the teabag in the water before microwaving it.
I know you are trying to bait me and I’m not going to fall for it
Feels a bit like that paperclip sim
I don’t see why you couldn’t give a few examples and then grab the dialog of a person in along with their description (or just the whole book) and get the llm to generate the prompt for you
What is you installed a gutter? And made the down pipe go into a bucket
It’s the third biggest broadsheet paper in the UK - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_newspapers_in_the_United_Kingdom