• @OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    Why? It’s the main thing people talk about when it comes to EVs. How far can I go? How fast can I recharge?

    It seems to be the most useful measurement.

    • @FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 months ago

      On top of that it’d be great for comparison which I imagine is the whole reason for it being presented like this I would rather have 800 km range and get 500 of that in 15 minutes (like if I’m on a long trip) than have 850 total range and only 15 km in 15 minutes

      • @DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -16 months ago

        But that’s exactly why it’s a bad unit to make comparisons on…I could claim 500km of range* in 15 on a car that only has 50kW of charging speed.

        *but only if you keep the speed under 50km/h, the temperature is 25°C, the road is dry and there is a tail wind.

        By using km as the unit, they can obfuscate a ton of information that make direct comparisons nearly impossible.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          66 months ago

          The very same thing is true with fuel economy ratings. The usefulness in such statistics is not in their specific accuracy for one vehicle, but in comparing more than one vehicle with each other (provided, of course, that the procedure for arriving at the ratings are similar enough).

    • @DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Sure, if it was consistent. But the range varies wildly even on the same car depending on speed and weather conditions. Is it 500km highway or 500km city driving? Is it in the winter or in the summer? Is it on a rainy day? Is there snow? Is there head wind or tail wind? 500km is a completely useless unit for charging speed and battery capacity without comprehensive context.