Under-16s will be banned from using social media, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced.

Starmer says social media is making children unhappy, making it easier for bullies to abuse children, and is “designed to be addictive”. A ban would give children more time, security, and more freedom to grow up - as well as more opportunities, he adds.

“That is all any parent wants. They want to know that Britain will be better for their children, that they will get a fair chance,” the PM says in a speech in Downing Street.

Starmer adds that the government is “not prepared to compromise” on the safety and happiness of children - and that includes in the regulation and enforcement of this ban. He says the government has listened to and learned from countries like Australia, where a similar ban has already been introduced.

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s insane that they’ll say it’s designed to be addictive, and then just let the company keep doing that. Like maybe go after the entity producing the addictive substance directly then?

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      All social media is designed to be addictive, though. It’s their entire business model.

          • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            That’s the problem with this panic. Everybody is using a different definition of social media. You and the other guy don’t hate social media, you hate Meta, X, and TikTok. And the government hates that too but also defines the Fediverse and forums in general, plus video games and anywhere else you might talk to another human being as social media as well.

            So if you’re on a social media site like Lemmy or Piefed and you’re complaining about how evil and addictive social media is, the government is going to read that and think “My god! This poor person is in trouble! They’re screaming for my help! I must pass a law to ban Lemmy and liberate Derpgon from they’re horrible addiction to the Fediverse! That’s what Derpgon wants!”

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Its a webforum, not a social media.

          Social media is places that revolve around shit in your real life no one cares about. Facebook, Instagram,Tiktok,Etc.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              First of all, Don’t blatantly lie about the very thing you are linking to. It is not listed as social media.

              They simply say some people (mostly idiots) refer to it as social media.

              So thats already points on you for intentionally and willfully misrepresenting information.

              Also the entire article is bunk cause it calls Mozilla and Minecraft social media. Which is stupid. Because Mozilla is a fucking company that makes a browser, and Minecraft is a goddamn game.

              Second of all, You can wrongly refer to something as social media all you want.

              I can write Fuck You on a brick and throw it through your window, and just because I Call it Macaroni refer to it as social media, doesnt magically make it social media.

              • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                First of all, Don’t blatantly lie about the very thing you are linking to. It is not listed as social media.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media#Decentralization_and_open_standards

                “While the dominant social media platforms are not interoperable, open source protocols such as ActivityPub have been adopted by platforms such as Mastodon, GNU social, Diaspora, and Friendica. They operate as a loose federation of mostly volunteer-operated servers, called the Fediverse.”

                The problem isn’t me wrongly referring to Lemmy and Reddit and other forums as social media. The problem is pretty much the entire world doing it. So until that gets fixed, it’s probably best not to call for the destruction of social media.

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  Just cause lots of people call something X, doesnt mean its X.

                  Otherwise Trump would be a literal god. And web forums would actually be social media.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        and a large part of that is the up/down vote systems, and other gamifications of human interaction.

        And they’ve spread out of social media into many other website types.

        All it does is extremify human interaction and is a major component in why we’re at the point we are right now with right wing extremism and fascism on the rise.

        Get rid of these systems, and let people just communicate with eachother without having to appeal to a hive mind to tell people who gave up thinking if somethings good or bad based on votes/reactions/etc

    • ziproot@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The engagement-based algorithmic feed is the problem. Kids being able to talk to strangers is also an issue, but that isn’t because of addiction, and I personally think public chats should just be opt-in with the expectation that the parents will actually do their job and teach their children not to talk to strangers.

    • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I think it’s insane because social media is addictive because being social and communicating with fellow human beings is addictive. That’s what you and me are doing here and why we find it so pleasurable. That is not a bad thing.

      It’s a bizarre lesson to drill into our children’s brains that this is a negative thing. I assume they don’t really know what social media is and see it as distinct, more like the one way communication of comic books, rock n roll, and other media moral panics, and they assume children will too. But what will happen to the next generation is that they will see all forms of human interaction as horribly addictive, amoral, and unhealthy.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    How do you get an entire population of adults to voluntarily scan their faces and submit them to Palantir?

    • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      I agree, but on the ageism point. The thing that needs to be done is regulation so that manipulative design is reduced. Its the corporations that are the problem. Bans only target the victims the most.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Consequences for rich people? Not blaming their victims?!? Who the fuck do you think you are, anyway??

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    Anything to avoid parents actually … parenting their children. Just like making weed illegal stopped everyone from smoking it! :D Same with alcohol.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Funny how this is being imposed on the population at large, but the same politicians pushing it are exempt. So self-sacrificing that they will put their children and grandchildren in peril to protect ours. They’re heroes.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      No it wouldnt. It’d be a .001% reduction in users.

      If you want social media to become a ghost town, ban bots/AI

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Can they even do it? AI nowadays can reliably parse captchas, present themselves as adults, with little effort they’ll even present documents and “real” photos

        • abc@suppo.fi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Full digital ID. Then the only for AI to get in is to steal a real human’s identification.

          Many civilized countries already have some system like this in place for critical stuff like banking, online healthcare, etc.

        • MortUS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          They could but it’s symbiotic. Social Media churns engagement using bots, which generates ad revenue.

          Not to mention that large Social Media companies like Meta are almost certainly filtering out bot content to train LLMs on.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            They obviously don’t want to do it. But my point is that I think they actually can’t.

            I mean Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Cloudflare definitely can’t filter real people from AI. Documents photos, real time videos, those are even easier for AI to fake than to the real people to make them.

            That brings us to the good old sms to a physical sim card purchased in a real shop with human face and document check. And that also will be spoofed in like 6 months.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I mean if people can figure out bot accounts and make lists of them just by looking at them, I’m pretty sure the companies that see 25000 accounts all connect from the same IP address can figure it out.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            if people can figure out bot accounts

            That’s a big IF and most of the times they don’t.

            25000 accounts all connect from the same IP address

            That’s just not how it works.

  • arararagi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    Considering youths are the most prone to protest, this is not about their protection at all

  • abc@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    I fully support the battle against attention-consuming energy vampires but I’m afraid this is probably not going to work practically.

  • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Really interesting they push for that the day of the report of investigation regarding rape gang and how the gouvernement didn’t protect children en even enable harm toward them. Trully disgusting. Really hope they get prosecuted by the next gouvernement