Lead Lemmy Developer, Dessalines, denying the Tiananmen Square Massacre and praising the Uyghur Genocide

https://sh.itjust.works/post/8419342

Dessalines AKA “parentis_shotgun” on Reddit, is the main Lemmy dev, also the admin of lemmy.ml and lemmygrad.ml.

Their post and discussions on Reddit (archive as the original post must have been removed):

https://web.archive.org/web/20230626055233/https://old.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/cqgztr/fuck_the_white_supremacist_reddit_admins_want_me/

Please join the discussions for Lemmy.ml tankie censorship problem:

https://lemmy.world/post/16211417

And the discussions for finding/creating alternative communities on other instances:

https://lemmy.world/post/16235541

What is a tankie?

Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those who support acts of repression by such regimes or their allies. More specifically, the term has been applied to those who express support for one-party Marxist–Leninist socialist republics, whether contemporary or historical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie

  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Bruh, Lemmy is a federated clone of Reddit. And tankies did not come up with the Fediverse or Reddit. If anything Lemmy is closer to a classic capitalist structure with the communities being owned by the admin (boss). Users have no control of any community no matter how much they contribute. I guess since tankies are state capitalists anyway they feel right at home.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      No, Marxists did not create the fediverse, but Marxists did create Lemmy.

      Explain how Free and Open Source, federation-based communities are more Capitalist than Marxist. Having managers does not make something Capitalist, lol.

      • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Explain how Free and Open Source, federation-based communities are more Capitalist than Marxist.

        The ability to choose what platform to use seems closer to the principle of voluntary exchange than to authoritatianism.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        5 months ago

        And Stallman was the person that invented FOSS, and he’s stated over and over he was not following any type of Communist principles. In fact FOSS programmers explicitly retain private property rights of software. It’s how they enforce the share alike clauses. If FOSS was built on some type of Communist principles it wouldn’t allow the bourgeois to build billion dollar enterprises on software they pay the writers nothing for.

          • Gigasser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I will add though that FOSS principles do tend to align more closely with the principles of non-commodification, collaboration, voluntary contribution, community-ownership, and free access to knowledge, which “can be” associated with socialist or Marxist ideals.

          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            5 months ago

            Lemmy is not based Communist principles is what I’m arguing please read. It’s not based on Communist principals because Reddit nor FOSS were which is the architecture Lemmy copied.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              Lemmy is based on Communist principles, the devs have stated as much. The fact that others use similar underlying principles does not change why Lemmy was developed in the manner it has been.

      • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        It does EL-0-L when the managers do not answer to users who create the actual value. And surprise surprise you have widespread complaints about heavy handed censorship on tankie run instances on anything that hurts their feelings.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          When the users can create their own instances or even fork the entire project for free, the dynamic is different. Plus, calling discussion “value” is kinda goofy.

          Lemmy.world has censorship too, just see return2ozma’s recent ban for criticizing Biden and not posting pro-Biden content as well, literally admitted by the admin in an official post.

          • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            5 months ago

            This is such a typical liberal answer. The value isn’t just created by the users’ post but by the collective network effect of all the users being in one place. That is not replicated when a new instance is created. Tankies know this which is why they’re acting like old Reddit mods with retaliatory style moderation.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re referring to discussion and posting as though it’s a commodity. Please read Marx, lol

              • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                15
                ·
                5 months ago

                I have read Marx, unlike you who’s just learned about Lenin through memes.

                The network effect is a commodity. That’s why X and Facebook fight for users and put them in walled gardens.

                Their valuations are based engagement. The most powerful and successful capitalist enterprises in history are all social media companies but okay discussion isn’t a commodity. How myopic can you be.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  16
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  The network effect is not a commodity. Lemmy is not produced for profit, it has no Value. Reread Capital, Volume 1, Chapter 1. It has a Use-Value, but no Exchange-Value and is not produced for profit. Capitalism necessitates profit and an M-C-M’ circuit by which Capitalists accumulate, which is absent from Lemmy entirely.

                  You’re deeply unserious.

                  • SeattleRain@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    15
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Another pedantic tankie argument. Just because something is not being exchanged doesn’t mean it can’t.

                    Regardless originally I said the network effect had value, not that it was a commodity. And the VALUE cannot be replicated by building another instance. Therefore the users do not own THE VALUE that they produce.

    • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      If anything Lemmy is closer to a classic capitalist structure with the communities being owned by the admin (boss).

      Personally, I like to think of instances as countries, where federation and defederation is akin to trade policies across the borders, and communities are like regional/state governments.