Temperatures above 50C used to be a rarity confined to two or three global hotspots, but the World Meteorological Organization noted that at least 10 countries have reported this level of searing heat in the past year: the US, Mexico, Morocco, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iran, Pakistan, India and China.

In Iran, the heat index – a measure that also includes humidity – has come perilously close to 60C, far above the level considered safe for humans.

Heatwaves are now commonplace elsewhere, killing the most vulnerable, worsening inequality and threatening the wellbeing of future generations. Unicef calculates a quarter of the world’s children are already exposed to frequent heatwaves, and this will rise to almost 100% by mid-century.

  • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    There are also some comments about aircon not being a good answer if solely relied on, including:

    One of the key effects of heatwaves, which send demand for electricity soaring and cause extreme storms that stress electrical grids, is to cause blackouts. Blackouts mean no more air-con. A recent study suggested a blackout lasting just two days could hospitalise more than half of Phoenix residents and kill 12,000, mostly in their own homes. This is why the author Jeff Goodell warns of a “heat Katrina”: you thought the hurricane in New Orleans was bad?

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Further, what happens when everyone knows the power isn’t coming back and instead the roads out of Phoenix all get backed up and people die in the heat of their cars trying to escape the heat of Phoenix. Because heat can kill a lot of vehicles, and a lot of people have ill-maintained vehicles, meaning roads being completely blocked from escape can happen fast.

      I really think Phoenix will become the first mass casualty event from climate change in the USA.

      EDIT: Obligatory Peggy Hill. Peggy gets it.

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s one of those nightmare thoughts - when the power goes out, what do people usually do for a while? Wait for it to come back on. Someone is coming to fix it, right? Much of modern society is built upon such assumptions, and it mostly works. So I think you’re right for some, but many would perish at home, trying to outlast the day (and what if the night doesn’t cool?)

          • Rhaedas@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Water also disappears. At some point water is being pumped by a power source. I suppose that’s more when people get driven out, by hunger and thirst than by just curiosity or a plan. So much easier to leave before things go bad, but like Katrina showed, mobility is a class thing, some people can’t leave like that.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Car radiators have fans. They can idle indefinitely. You’re more likely to eventually run out of gas.

          Edit: oh you mean because of the heat. I don’t think that’s going to be an issue, ambient temp is still going to be far below the roughly 200°F of an engine.

          • Blaster M@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            This assumes a car with a working cooling system. How many people have old cars with bad head gaskets or a radiator leak and “just fill it with water” and not fix the problem, only to find that pure water isn’t enough, as modern cars will walk up and down from 185-235F, which will blow steam before the fans kick on. They never noticed because they only drove a few miles a day, not long or hard enough to find out there is a real problem and not a nuisance.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        EDIT: Obligatory Peggy Hill. Peggy gets it.

        And considering how rarely she “got” things, that’s saying a lot!

      • Reyali@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s when it becomes Rita as opposed to “heat Katrina”.

        For folks who don’t remember/know about Rita because they didn’t live through it, less than a month after Katrina a record-breaking cat 5 hurricane was heading for Texas. Everyone still had Katrina on their minds and panicked. Millions of people (literally estimated as 2.5–3.7 million) evacuated, or tried.

        The highways out of Houston came to a total standstill. About 100 people died before the storm even hit land because of the evacuation. And then the hurricane itself was nbd; the evacuation was literally the worst part.

    • 31337@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      A significant amount of greenhouse gasses are emitted because of air conditioning. It’s a feedback loop.

      • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wait really? Do you mean by the electricity generation or by a refrigerant process?

        I know those processes are inefficient and create overall heat in the system as they can’t create cool but only push heat, there should be no green house emission, just heat generation.

        Are you saying extra heat will stay in the atmosphere? That’s not good but it’s not the same as carbon which allows heat to build up.

        • 31337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          The power used by AC is responsible for ~3% of global emissions. I can’t find data about the impact of refrigerants ATM, but I assume it’s significant because of their extremely high “global-warming-potential.” I’m guessing a significant amount of emissions come from the manufacture of refrigerants, and a significant amount of refrigerants leak out of systems when they fail (or are improperly disposed of).

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I keep an old evaporative unit in the shed just in case. It only needs 70 watts and can thus run for quite a long time off a car battery or similar. Add a basic camping solar panel and you’re more or less set for the day as long as you have water and don’t live in a really high humidity place.

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Air conditioners will soon be considered life support. In some places it will be a death sentence to have a power outrage. This isn’t speculation. It’s already happening.

    • Know_not_Scotty_does@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Frankly, I am amazed it has not already happened in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, or Austin. The power grid here in Texas is a disaster and the weather conditions are unforgiving. At least in the desert you can do evaporative cooling. That doesn’t work where its hot and humid.

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It has. Some weak ass cat-1 hurricane killed like a dozen people in TX earlier this year. The winds didn’t harm anyone directly but it knocked out power for a few days in places. That’s all it takes when temps are well above 100F.