• jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I get the cost, but it should be an option to upgrade any current EV to this new style battery.

    • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It’s not needed in today’s EVs. Things should be upgradable yes, but it’s not necessary to replace current existing lithium batteries with this and doing so would probably do more harm than good. The ones we have already outlast the vehicle’s lifespan, and go further than a tank of gas.

      We don’t even know how to recycle these new types, at least we’ve made some headway with the current gen packs.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m thinking less in terms of lifespan and more in terms of range and charging time.

        You shouldn’t have to upgrade your entire car to get a 600 mile range and 9 minute charge time if all that’s needed is better battery tech.

        • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Two questions if that’s the reasoning: how often are you driving 600 let alone 300 miles? How often are you out of range of charging, if at all? Charging at fast chargers already only takes 20 minutes, the same amount it takes to pee and get a drink.

          Charging at home makes range not matter. It’s not gas, you’re just always charged up. You don’t want to sit at 100% anyway, because again, it’s not gas.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            The object is to get people to give up gas cars, you do that by providing a better range and a “refill” time roughly equivalent with sitting at a gas pump.

            And, yeah, vast areas of the country do not yet have good access to charging stations:

            https://www.axios.com/2024/06/25/charging-deserts-evs-electric-cars

            https://www.eenews.net/articles/ev-charging-deserts-are-growing-in-rural-areas-study/

            https://www.hbs.edu/bigs/the-state-of-ev-charging-in-america

            • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              You’re missing the point: it’s not like gas, and can’t be compared as such. If you have a home charger, you never need to use public charging except when road tripping, because your car charges within 4-6ish hours (my home charger does around ~22mi/hr), or overnight if you have a slower charger. You cannot do the same with gas unless you just top off at the gas pump every day.

              I’m not trying to get into charging deserts right now - frankly, most people do not live in them, and thus make up less of the EV market at the moment. We haven’t even come close to meeting your given objective of replacing gas in even populated areas. Anyway, this article is about a 600 mile solid state battery that will only be in luxury $200k+ cars (which most people in very rural counties wouldn’t be able to afford), if at all. Not charging deserts.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Not everyone can have a home charger. People living in apartments and condos won’t have access. Heck, even people who do have their own homes will have to upgrade their electrical panels to allow for charging.

                Until everyone can charge at home, it all boils down to how much range a car gets and how fast it recharges, which is why this new battery tech is such a game changer.

                • AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Again, the people that can’t have a charger at home will not be able to afford this. It’s not a game changer, it would take higher powered chargers than the ones that currently exist, making your whole “charging desert” issue more problematic (not to mention that you first had an issue with rural charging and are now talking about urban environments where charging access is easy to come by even if not directly in your apartment).

                  The solution isn’t prohibitively expensive 600 mile range batteries (are you still saying you need that on the daily?), it’s more chargers.

                  Once again, it seems like you think EVs work and charge/fill up in the same way as ICE vehicles. They don’t, and unless you’ve driven or owned one I’m not sure why you’d be speaking from such an authoritative standpoint.

    • ZealousSealion@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      There’s a good chance you are mistaken. It was not specified which type of mile they are referencing.

      The only sensible mile to use would be the Scandinavian mile (10.000m). = 6000km range.

      Another possibility is the nautical mile (1852m). = 1.111,2km range.

      And there are plenty of other “miles” to choose from.

  • Happywop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Oh please! I’d love to see Big Oil shrivel and die just like our societies and very planet have under their influence.

    • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Too bad the lithium battery industry is no better. Those places are child labor slave mines and the environmental damage is astronomical…

      • bricklove@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        This is true but coal mining is just as bad and requires orders of magnitude (mineral fuels) more excavation than all of the other minerals combined. If we can stop mining coal by using renewables the total amount of mining will be a fraction of what it currently is. Plus many of the other minerals can be reused where coal just ends up as carbon in the atmosphere.

        • Pogbom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          This is exactly it. Of course battery production is harmful too, but not only is it less harmful than other sources to extract, you also don’t have to burn batteries to generate the power. With fossil fuels, the extraction is massively more harmful and then the use itself creates even more pollution.

          • bastion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Trees are technically a green, renewable fuel (if humanity used them that way). The carbon dioxide released is that which was sequestered during the tree’s life.

            But oil is gathering material that accrued over vast amounts of time, and using that, dumping huge volumes of co2 directly onto the air. There’s no cycle happening there - just pure extraction for our extinction.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    If this works as advertised then it’ll revolutionize more than just cars. This is huge

    • Wooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      So long as its not 2,3,4 times the price of current cars. Otherwise put them in busses and trains. Cost is strangly missing, I’m guessing because it is prohibitive.